Talk:Katirkamam temple
Appearance
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Katirkamam temple be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Sri Lanka may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Permission from Hinduism Today editors
[edit]Namaste,
We give permission for the entire article from Hinduism Today be incorporated in Wikipedia. If there are more formalities to complete, kindly let us know. The article shall be clearly identified as coming from Hinduism Today and contain a link to the original on our website.
- Sannyasin Arumugaswami
- Managing Editor
- Hinduism Today Magazine
- 107 Kaholalele Road
- Kapaa, HI 96746 USA
- Phone: 808 822-7032, ext. 227
- Fax: 808 822-4351
Discussion
[edit]I recreated this article from the original Kataragama article as it deals with a completely different issue. That is the Buddhist takeover or a temple that was essentialy a hindu place of worship.
RaveenS 17:10, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- Reference regarding takeover of the temple “This especially is embarassing to many Sinhala Buddhists. Today they consider Kataragama unlike Kali as a national Buddhist god, since the shrine a few decades ago completely fell into the hands of the Sinhala Buddhists (see also Gombrich and Obeyesekere, 1988, p. 99 and Chapter 5). Knowing that Buddha has condemned "billa," they feel somewhat ashamed that Kadavera is accepting "billa" from people, especially businessmen, and exercising harmful powers near or at least not far from the Kataragama shrine. They often try to deny it or to cover it up, when I ask for information about it”
- Raveen, stop copying and pasting copyright articles here at Wikipedia from Hinduism Today. http://www.hinduismtoday.com/archives/1986/12/1986-12-09.shtml -- this is a direct cut and paste and utterlybiased.
- I will rewrite the article with Hinduism Today as well as other sources as references. But the article is not biased; RaveenS 13:36, 17 April 2006 (UTC)