Talk:Katie Sugden

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Emmerdale task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Soap Operas

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera articles

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Comment

This seems to be written in a non-encyclopaedic way - it sounds like it was taken out of TV Quick or something (although I accept it probably wasn't). Perhaps this could be re-written in a more factual style. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.201.69.119 (talk) 22:59, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Katie and Jo catfight.png

The image File:Katie and Jo catfight.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --01:24, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Emmerdale character articles; invitation to discussion

I've begun a discussion regarding the atrocious state of character articles within the Emmerdale universe. These articles stand to be deleted unless corrective action is taken. Please join the conversation at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Emmerdale#Serious problems across the board; let's start with character articles. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 16:00, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sam and Jodie Addyman

According to this page, Katie has a brother called Sam and a sister called Jodie. Has it actually been confirmed whether these characters even exist onscreen or is it just a mistake by the person who set up the page.92.232.245.253 (talk) 19:22, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

[1]] - Reception
[2] - ReceptionRain the 1 00:48, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Surname

Yet again this article has undergone an undiscussed name change. Just because a character changes their name on-screen does not necessarily mean it should be changed here. The majority of the character's storylines have occurred while her name has been Sugden, which I believe is also her WP:COMMONNAME. I think this article needs to be moved back or at least further discussion. - JuneGloom Talk 00:39, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I saw nothing on this talk page that suggested that a move might be controversial. Nor was there anything less than a year old in the move logs for Katie Addyman, Katie Macey or Katie Sugden which suggested that there had been recent move-and-revert. --Redrose64 (talk) 13:04, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Death

She wasn't accidentally killed by Robert. He was angry and would not let her leave. This was manslaughter at the least. More likely murder. I know some get obsessed with gay storylines/characters and don't want to think of gays leaving the soaps but please let's not downplay what vile Robert did. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.18.198.10 (talk) 21:48, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Katie Sugden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:00, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]