Talk:Kathleen Barry

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kathleen Barry article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Feminism Low‑importance

	Feminism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sexology and sexuality: Sex work Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Sex work task force (assessed as Low-importance).

It is requested that an image or photograph of Kathleen Barry be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Is the issue in this entry POV? Or is it that she is non-notable?

Could Iamcuriousblue or other editors explain how this article is non-neutral? The way it is written now that I've removed one phrase about her "making an important contribution," it's a stub that has a section about what Barry herself states in her writing. It doesn't really seem slanted one way or the other to me.

What does seem to be an issue to me is that the entry does not establish her notability with three valid, significant third-party sources ABOUT her.

Could other editors chime in? Aroundthewayboy (talk) 03:44, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think she meets the notability requirements of WP:AUTHOR. I don't see the NPOV tag is justified. With no explanation given by the editor who added the tag, we don't know what he perceived as POV. I suggest we remove the tag in a couple of weeks if there are no objections. --John B123 (talk) 16:03, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK yeah, I would take off both tags in a couple weeks if nobody else objects.

I added the notability tag because I was hoping someone might add something to really establish her notability. I forgot that a NYT book review could be one of the three sources establishing her notability, which would mean the article currently passes notability. It would be better with another independent citation or two about her, though, if anyone is so inspired. Aroundthewayboy (talk) 18:23, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding the references to flesh out her notability. I removed that notability tag, since I was the one who added it. I would also support removing the NPOV tag, but as John B wrote, we should probably wait a couple weeks. Aroundthewayboy (talk) 16:52, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As we have had no further comments I've removed the POV tag - --John B123 (talk) 16:53, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]