Talk:Kaset Green Hawk
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kaset Green Hawk article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
First added
[edit]I wrote this article and all photo here is my and my friend original work. Analayo (talk) 19:49, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Category
[edit]I am pretty doubtful that this article should be categorized under "aerobatic teams". The article had indicted that this is an aerobatic team, but they are flying an aircraft that carries an "aerobatics prohibited" restriction, so I edited out references to aerobatics and replaced it with "aerial display" instead. Perhaps we need a category for "aerial display teams" instead? - Ahunt (talk) 13:58, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
Images
[edit]All the images used in the this article seem to have wording or watermarks on them indicating they are copyrighted and "all rights reserved". This contradicts the licensing under which they were uploaded which indicates they are free images. Which is correct? Also normally Wikipedia does not permit stamped or watermarked images as they constitute advertising. - Ahunt (talk) 13:58, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
Finding solution
[edit]In Thailand we called this team an aerobatic team and we do not have a rule that prohibited some specific aircraft for aerobatic display so I categorized them as an aerobatic team. Is it contradicts with international standard or not? Should we follow the international meaning or just strict on the original one because in Thailand we prohibit this aircraft to fly in aerobatic team. How we should categorize them? (with respect, what is the different between 'aerobatic team' and 'aerial display team'? and is the 'aerobatics prohibited' rule needs to apply to Thailand?)
Those image is my own work and I give it to public for free but I do not know about the rule of watermark. So this is my mistake and I will correct it.
About reference. This team do not have a website but got publish in local magazine. Can I uses it as a reference? Analayo (talk) 17:19, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
- Sure any published reference would be a help!
- As far as aerobatics vs display goes, I changed that because the Caravan is prohibited by the manufacturer from flying aerobatics, like loops, rolls, hammerheads, etc. The change to "display" was just to show that the team flies a display routine, but not aerobatics. it isn't totally clear to me from your note above, what sorts of maneuvers are they doing? - Ahunt (talk) 17:23, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
- Surely they do not fly something like loops, rolls, hammerheads because their aircraft can not do that! This is clear for me. I forget the name of maneuver they fly but I looks at the list of maneuver in Aerobatic maneuver aritcle and I found no maneuver that they use. So this team should be listed as display team like you suggests. This is also my new knowledge. Thank! Analayo (talk) 08:42, 3 October 2008 (UTC)