Jump to content

Talk:Kars/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tea with toast (talk · contribs) 00:09, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Opening comments

[edit]

It will probably take me a few days to complete this review, but I intend to finish in a week's time. Just a few items that need to be taken care of in the meantime:

  • Bare URLs are not acceptable sources as they are prone to link rot; please use full citations
  • A section that consists of only 1-2 sentences is not generally an acceptable section. Either more information should be added to complete the subtopic, or it may not be noteworthy enough to include. Please address the following sections:
    • Government -- a topic worth having a section about; should be expanded; if no other info can be found, it might be placed under "Recent history"
    • Sports -- worth having if it can be expanded; it could be shaped into a section on "Culture"; if no other information can be added, the sentence is trivial enough to delete.
    • Education -- either expand or combine with "Government" or "Places of interest"

Happy editing! --Tea with toast (話) 00:09, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tea with toast, mate i am busy with tose college stuff at the moment so can we put this on hold for some time? kazekagetr 08:25, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem. I'm busy with school stuff myself. We can take this slow, no rush, no worries. --Tea with toast (話) 04:23, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
What's the status here? I understand both sides are busy but no updates in over a month is nonetheless concerning. Wizardman 16:55, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Tea with toast, KazekageTR, the issues originally raised have still not been addressed in the article after over a month and a half, the full review has not been completed, and there's been no response to Wizardman's query. Under the circumstances, it is probably best if the nomination is closed, and perhaps resubmitted after the article has been expanded per the above. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:57, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I just noticed that the writer has made a good number of edits since the notes above, so it looks like this is abandoned; as such I'm closing it. Wizardman 05:21, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]