Talk:Karmacoda

This article was nominated for deletion on 19 January 2020. The result of the discussion was keep.

The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from www.karmacoda.com. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material. Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by VRT volunteers, under ticket number 2006041410012906.
This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-enwikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission.

I am the principle author of the Karmacoda Wikipedia page as well as the Karmacoda bio page that is listed as a copyright conflict. I give permission for this content to be used. Please unblock the page! Brett Crockett, User: Rimbaud234

The content has been edited to be more formal and tone. I believe that the notice on the page should be removed.

Yea, its pretty acceptable. The only problem I see now is that it needs to have better citing of sources (where the comments by reviewers are coming from, what the independent music awards won are, what the soundtracks they appear on are, etc.). Other than that its fine.--Head of the Caligula Appreciation Society 03:02, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For soundtrack information check out the filmography section. The style of comments of reviewers and the award notification is consistent with other entries in Wikipedia (and in fact those here are modeled on the tone of many others that already exist).

The style of the comments isn't the issue (I'm not quite sure why you mention this either, I didn't say anything about the style), but you do need to document where they are coming from, per wikipedia policy: "1. Articles should contain only material that has been published by reputable sources. 2. Editors adding new material to an article should cite a reputable source, or it may be removed by any editor. 3. The obligation to provide a reputable source lies with the editors wishing to include the material, not on those seeking to remove it." The fact that other entries aren't sufficiently citing their sources does not give reason for this page to do the same, but only points out the other pages should be fixed as well.--Head of the Caligula Appreciation Society 21:22, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD discussion

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karmacoda (aeropagitica) (talk) 21:36, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Karmacoda. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120301011303/http://www.musiciansatlas.com/jukebox/index.html to http://www.musiciansatlas.com/jukebox/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:52, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]