Talk:Karl G. Maeser/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 18:37, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I will be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAGUAR  18:37, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   "He left for Europe in May 1867, leaving his family in a poor financial state." - this part needs a citation

   "He was an example of hard work, dedication and faithfulness. His ideas on educational philosophy, the honor system, and incorporation of religious classes continue to be implemented at Brigham Young University, where the Maeser Building is named after him." - I couldn't find this in any source (unless I missed it)

2. Ref 20 is missing an access date
3. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   No original research found.

4. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

5. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

6. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

7. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

8. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Excellent article! It is well written, comprehensive and all of the sources are verifiable. I can see that it is well researched, so it meets every aspect of the GA criteria. JAGUAR  19:12, 4 December 2016 (UTC)