Jump to content

Talk:Karl Aloys zu Fürstenberg/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Reviewer: MisterBee1966 (talk) 07:59, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Question did he receive an military decorations? MisterBee1966 (talk) 10:28, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • When comparing the German article to this article I find a number of omissions. Example: according to the German article he fought Laurent de Gouvion Saint-Cyr at the Battle near Schliengen on 24 October 1796. I can only assume that this may be covered in the article Battle of Emmendingen. A further delta is that he was the name patron of Infanterie-Regiment Nr. 36. Just to name a few. I think that the entire section of the First Coalition could be expanded a bit more. Again this is motivated after reading the German Wiki article which details this period a lot more.MisterBee1966 (talk) 10:42, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • At the end of section 1, he is noted as Colonel and Proprietor of 34th Infantry regiment.
  • I'll add Schliengen. There is a lot in the German article that I didn't use because I couldn't find a source on it. Auntieruth55 (talk) 20:32, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support I found two minor grammatical errors and one spelling error and took the liberty to fix them myself. Otherwise I think this is a very nice article. I do want to point out that I do not feel adapt enough to challenge your writing skills. So another reviewer may find something to object. MisterBee1966 (talk) 10:52, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]