Jump to content

Talk:Karen Wynn

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"References", "Original Research" & "Improper References" tags Discussion

[edit]

This page now contains numerous citations of independent, third party, secondary sources. I suggest removal of these tags and invite community discussion to determine if there is consensus. If no objections within the next 48 hours or so, I shall remove these tags. If there are objections, please discuss on this Talk page and suggest improvements needed (or provide yourself). Dianeblack (talk) 21:28, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This article should not be deleted

[edit]

For all the reasons indicated by the author below, this article should not be deleted. Karen Wynn easily satisfies the Wikipedia standards for notable academics.

128.36.194.80 (talk) 21:10, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

[edit]

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because <Karen Wynn is a sufficiently notable person. She has given numerous interviews in the popular press, for example:

NPR All Things Considered Weekend Edition on May 9, 2010 http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=126653606 , and on BBC radio.

Karen Wynn and her research have been featured on numerous science television shows, including:

1. The Human Spark with Alan Alda, which aired on PBS January 20, 2010 (see http://www.pbs.org/wnet/humanspark/episodes/program-three-brain-matters/video-full-episode/418/ );

2. the National Geographic Explorer show that aired Sept 19, 2007;

3. a Discovery Channel documentary on human babies that aired in 2002;

4. a London BBC television documentary on mathematical thought and education in 1997;

and others.

Her work was featured on the front page of the New York Times on August 27, 1992; and in the New York Times online in December, 2007; see http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/04/health/research/04beha.html

Moreover, Karen Wynn's ideas and research have been highly influential in the field of psychology. Her 1992 Nature paper has been highly cited, receiving nearly 1000 citations (Google Scholar count). Her total citation count for all of her published works is about 4000 (Google Scholar), and she has many papers with citation rates exceeding 100. Her work on infants' early numerical competence has been quite influential: It is standardly cited in general textbooks of Introductory Psychology.

In recognition of this influence, she has received Awards by notable organizations, including the American Psychological Association, and, most notably, the National Academy of Sciences, to officially recognize the significance and importance of her research accomplishments.

Thus, the subject satisfies both criteria 1 and 2 for notability of academics, as specified on the Wikipedia Notability: Academics page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_%28academics%29#Citation_metrics.


>. — Dianeblack (talk) 02:39, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Karen Wynn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:54, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]