Talk:Kapi ramnagarensis

Mammals Low‑importance

	Mammals portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Primates Low‑importance

	Primates portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Primates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Primates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PrimatesWikipedia:WikiProject PrimatesTemplate:WikiProject PrimatesPrimate articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Infobox

According to Gilbert, et al.

Systematic palaeontology

Order Primates Linnaeus, 1758
- Suborder Anthropoidea Mivart, 1864
  - Infraorder Catarrhini Geoffroy St. Hilaire, 1812
    - Superfamily Hominoidea Gray, 1825
      - Family Hylobatidae Gray, 1870
        Kapi ramnagarensis gen. et sp. nov.

I don't know how to edit this infobox but the infobox has different suborder, infraorder and superfamily missing.-Nizil (talk) 05:55, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll answer, though this is an old question and no longer relevant. First, Wikipedia is using a different overarching classification. To wit, we don't use Anthropoidea, instead we use Haplorrhini. Second, we use a template to contain the taxonomic data and maintain its consistency. The template for Kapi is {{taxonomy/Kapi}}. In the template you can change what Kapi's parent taxon is. Also, {{speciesbox}} has a number of parameters for controling how and what is displayed in the infobox. I hope this help. (Also, I just moved Kapi to Pliopithecoidea.) - UtherSRG (talk) 12:04, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]