Talk:Kansas experiment

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Kansas Mid‑importance

	Kansas portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kansas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Kansas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KansasWikipedia:WikiProject KansasTemplate:WikiProject KansasKansas articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: AhellierUCSD.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:34, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Results/outcomes

This page, should really have a results/outcome section that note the economic results of this 'experiment'. It would be really useful as a source for supply-side economics evidence .. I just don't actually know what the results were. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mdb23b (talk • contribs) 15:15, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions for Improvement

Overall I think this page contains good information, but please let me offer some improvements. First, the section "Benefit for State Lawmakers", while an interesting little tidbit, is not relevant. This has nothing to do with the actual content of this Bill and comes from a very partisan place, I would recommend removing this section. Second, this article is not neutral enough. There are a lot of pseudo-factual statements like "job growth has lagged behind its neighbors" and "revenue is less than projected" but the actual figures of job growth, revenue, and other relevant factors are not present. I would recommend replacing these types of statements with actual comparative figures of Kansas revenue, and job growth to other states and let readers draw their own conclusions. Third, most of the sources cited in this article are from news outlets, and many of those are editorials. We should not cite opinion articles as sources on Wikipedia, there should be either State or academic figures that are available to cite in these cases. Figures like what the projected versus the actual revenue was would be an improvement. Overall, the anti-tax-cut view is significantly overrepresented in this article. And finally, the figures that are used on this page are a few years old now. We should add figures from the last couple of years to guide to evolution of this page. --AhellierUCSD (talk) 04:15, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kansas Senate Bill Substitute HB 2117. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:38, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

change emphasis and maybe title

Now that years have passed and the bill has essentially been repealed I propose we change the article to give it a broader focus and perhaps change the title to something like "The Kansas Experiment". I am going to rewrite the article along these lines. --BoogaLouie (talk) 23:31, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Have updated and rewritten the article.

One note: I have used a lot of quotations in the article This is in part because this is a controversial topic and I hope that by making the wording used by the sources exact I will make the issue that much less controversial. --BoogaLouie (talk) 15:30, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPV?

While my personal politics (which lean progressive) might agree with the gist of this article, it feels like a hit piece or a morality play, where even in the opening paragraphs of the article one senses the Kansas conservatives will be shown to be dolts.

It's a very classy and well-documented hit piece, though, as one might find in The Atlantic or The Economist.

Leave the gun, take the cannoli.

Ummm, drop the tone, keep the research. 206.214.237.137 (talk) 03:40, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Signed in now. The comments above are mine. Esnickell2 (talk) 03:46, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]