This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The procedural issues with the recent RFD are annoying, and it's only been two weeks since the DRV closed? At the same time, we are not a bureaucracy, and as long as the request to look at this again was made in good faith, we can still allow ourselves to look at the merits. So, there's clearly some ambiguity to this phrase. Are the readers recognizing this as ambiguous? We can try to find traces of that in the clickstreams: clickstream-enwiki-2024-02.tsv shows 6,277 clickstreams from 2024_Kansas_City_parade_shooting to Kansas_City_massacre. clickstream-enwiki-2024-03.tsv shows 172 clickstreams from 2024_Kansas_City_parade_shooting to Kansas_City_massacre and 76 from Kansas_City_shooting to 2024_Kansas_City_parade_shooting. Because of the recent nature of the event, there was a huge amount of reader interest in February, which started to subside in March [1]. Presenting a list to readers shouldn't be out of the question, but maybe we need to make sure the most recent events are at the top, as chronological ordering isn't necessarily beneficial to navigation here. It seems the trial for the Ralph Yarl shooting is coming up later this year, and then the reader interest may yet ebb and flow. --Joy (talk) 13:27, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I personally disagree with the results of the RFD. That being said, what's done is done - there were two discussions, plus a review, and the consensus is clear. Rehashing this here is not an option. 162 etc. (talk) 17:40, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@162 etc. I would ordinarily agree, but so many WP:RMs are redundant, that we can probably tolerate one more :) granted, if we left it alone for a couple of months to be able to see the monthly stats, that would be fine, too. --Joy (talk) 08:32, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
