Jump to content

Talk:Kansan glaciation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[Untitled]

[edit]

Has anyone got any sources that explain the relationships between all the worldwide glacial stages? From my limited research I get the impression that there are variations between what are at best only general co-relations between the glacials and interglacials in different regions. However these may relate to differences in results from different investigative methods between different geologists too. I'm confused. adamsan 18:14, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

A person can find an explanation of the relationships in:
Sibrava, V., Bowen, D.Q, and Richmond, G.M., 1986, 
Quaternary Glaciations in the Northern Hemisphere, 
Quaternary Science Reviews. vol. 5, pp. 1-514.
This volume has correlation charts showing the inferred relationships between the different glaciations.
More recent correlation charts, which illustrates the relationships between the different glacial stages in different parts of the world can be seen, are:
Gibbard, P.L., S. Boreham, K.M. Cohen and A. Moscariello, 2005, Global chronostratigraphical correlation table for the last 2.7 million years v. 2005c., PDF version 220 KB. Subcommission on Quaternary Stratigraphy, Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England
Gibbard, P.L., S. Boreham, K.M. Cohen and A. Moscariello, 2007, Global chronostratigraphical correlation table for the last 2.7 million years v. 2007b., jpg version 844 KB. Subcommission on Quaternary Stratigraphy, Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England
Both of these charts show that the usage of Nebraskan, Kansan, Yarmouth, and Aftonian stages have been completely abandoned within North America. They have been merged in a pre–Illinoian stage. A brief discussion of the history behind the abandonment of these stages can be found in
Roy, M.,, P.U. Clark, R.W. Barendregt, J.R., Glasmann, and R.J. Enkin, 2004, Glacial stratigraphy and paleomagnetism of late Cenozoic deposits of the north-central United States., PDF version, 1.2 MB. Geological Society of America Bulletin. vol. 116, no. 1-2; pp. 30-41; DOI: 10.1130/B25325.1
More detailed information can be found is:
Hallberg, G.R., ed., 1980a, Pleistocene stratigraphy in 
east-central Iowa., PDF version 15.6 MB. Technical information Series. no. 10. 
Iowa Geological Survey Bureau, Ames, IA.
Hallberg, G. R., ed., 1980b, Illinoian and Pre-Illinoian 
stratigraphy of southeast Iowa and adjacent Illinois., PDF version 19.3 MB. 
Technical information Series. no. 11. Iowa Geological 
Survey Bureau, Ames, IA.
Hallberg, G. R., T. E. Fenton, T. J. Kemmis, and G. A. 
Miller, 1980, Yarmouth Revisited: Midwest Friends of 
the Pleistocene 27th Field Conference., PDF version 4.6 MB. Guidebook no. 3. 
Iowa Geological Survey Bureau, Ames, IA. Paul H. (talk) 15:26, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

[edit]

If a person would look at the above publications, they will find the North American Quaternary geologists have that the "Kansas Glaciation" is a hodge-podge collection of glacial deposits, some of which have been also been attributed to the Nebraskan glaciation in differents parts of the from five or six glaciations. As a result, as discussed in the above publications, the terms "Kansan" and "Nebraskan" are a totally meaningless mixture of glacial deposits that predate the Illionian Stage. Also, this results in the events described in this article contains events and both **postdate** and **predate** the Anglian Stage by hundreds of thousands of years. The only thing that really can be done in prepare two new articles on the Pre-Illinoian and Illinoian stages. Go read:

Roy, M.,, P.U. Clark, R.W. Barendregt, J.R., Glasmann, and R.J. Enkin, 2004, Glacial stratigraphy and paleomagnetism of late Cenozoic deposits of the north-central United States., PDF version, 1.2 MB. Geological Society of America Bulletin. vol. 116, no. 1-2; pp. 30-41; DOI: 10.1130/B25325.1Paul H. (talk) 17:19, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is a complete lack of any one-to-one correlation between the Kansan and Anglian stages that can be used to merge these articles.Paul H. (talk) 17:21, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, a person can read:


I also oppose the proposed merge of Kansan and Anglian. Additional to the comments of Paul H, even if the Kansan and Anglian were well defined equivalents, there is a great deal to be written about each which has little in common beyond time period. In the event of a merger, presumably one or other term would have to be given (undeserved) priority over the other. Granted there is a Last glacial period article, but what would this one be called? That article is an indicator of what is likely to happen, relegating as it does the Devensian to three sentences. Pterre (talk) 17:50, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

United States

[edit]

This article contains info only about United States (US-POV). Please set a proper template into article. 212.59.241.9 (talk) 01:34, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What had you in mind? This is a US term. Pterre (talk) 11:27, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
As Pierre noted above, in both definition and usage, the Kansan stage / glaciation is subdivision of Quaternary that is restricted in usage to glacial deposits in North American, Canada and United States of America. As a result, this article by the definition of the Kansan stage / glaciation will not contain any information outside of these two countries. A different set subdivisions are used in Europe and elsewhere.Paul H. (talk) 12:23, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Kansan glaciation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:14, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Kansan glaciation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:07, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kansan glaciation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:07, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Kansan_glaciation&oldid=1223940465"