Talk:Kangyur

Tibet High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tibet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TibetWikipedia:WikiProject TibetTemplate:WikiProject TibetTibet articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Buddhism Low‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Untitled

The page implies that the Stog palace Kanjur was printed in Stog. In fact it is a manscript copy held there. Tibetologist 13:37, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kangyur = Kantyua?

"The Tibetan books Tantyua and Kantyua" says Erich von Däniken... Kanyur = Kantyua? / the same book? Böri (talk) 09:27, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@Böri:Obviously yes ~ but his transcription of the Tibetan is atrocious Chris Fynn (talk) 21:35, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Böri (talk) 08:50, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet Pearl

On the page it says

Traditional Chinese 甘珠爾

Simplified Chinese 甘珠尔

Literal meaning Translation of the Word

Now "Translation of the Word" may very well be the translation of "Literal meaning," or it may be its literal meaning. It is not, however, a translation of 甘珠爾.

The translation of those three words, i.e. their literal meaning, would be "sweet, pearl, thus."

Now somebody may at some point have been expressing the thought "Thus, aren't these sweet pearls?" or something of the sort. A figurative meaning of this might be "How wonderful, this meaning..." and so one might get somewhere near the region of something being translated into something else. Here I am rather stretching, I think, to give whoever wrote this some benefit of a doubt...

DavidLJ (talk) 03:38, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is a translation of the original Tibetan title. Chris Fynn (talk) 07:15, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

Why does the Chinese name come first in the infobox? Surely, since this is a Tibetan language work, the Tibetan name should come first.
Chris Fynn (talk) 05:58, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. (Replaced Infobox Chinese with Infobox Tibetan-Chinese)
Chris Fynn (talk) 07:15, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]