Talk:Kanbay
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kanbay article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is biased
[edit]Not sure why someone thinks it is biased.
It seems pretty factual to me and not biased. The numbers presented can be validated in SEC filings. The history appears accurate and supported by articles and press releases in other.
The tone seems neutral, there aren't a lot of "claims" about performance. There are a couple insinuations ("claims to be CMM Level 5") that might be viewed as insinuating something else. However, I suspect they could produce their CMM Level 5 certifications easily enough.
What's the bias issue? What did I miss?
Categories:
- Start-Class Chicago articles
- Low-importance Chicago articles
- WikiProject Chicago articles
- Start-Class Computing articles
- Low-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- Start-Class India articles
- Low-importance India articles
- Start-Class India articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject India articles
- Start-Class software articles
- Low-importance software articles
- Start-Class software articles of Low-importance
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- All Software articles