Talk:Kaname Harada/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 14:49, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Section 1.1;
- A comma (,) after "After completing school"
- the Imperial Japanese Navy's marine force; the navy itself is a marine force. Please reword to avoid confusion.
  - The term was referring to Marines, but the IJN didn't really have them - it had naval infantry, so I've tweaked this. Nick-D (talk) 22:22, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- during the first months of the war -> during the initial months of the war
  - Done Nick-D (talk) 22:22, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Infobox;
- Mention date of his death.
  - It's there at present. Nick-D (talk) 22:22, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Section 2; all good.
15.3% violation
No dab links found.
External links check shows one dead link, fix it.
All images are appropriately licensed.

@Krishna Chaitanya Velaga: Sorry for my slow response; somehow I missed that you'd posted the review. I think that I've now addressed your comments. Nick-D (talk) 22:22, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 03:03, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]