Jump to content

Talk:Kampfgeschwader 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Just started the article, more to come. Dapi89 (talk) 20:12, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Google Translate

[edit]

Kampf%0Ageschwader - Google Translate:fight%0AsquadronXb2u7Zjzc32 (talk) 22:12, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

page dump

[edit]

KG 3 began the campaign in the west with a strength of 112 Do 17s and Ju 88s, with 92 Serviceable.[1] KG supported the offensive through the Ardennes and Belgium, later bombed the Allied ports Ostend and Dunkirk, during the Allied evacuation. II./KG 3 supported the crucial breakthrough at Sedan. Other elements supported the drive to the Swiss border, encircling the French forces on the Maginot Line. For operations over Britain KG 3 was moved to airfields at St Trond and Le Culot in Belgium.

At the beginning of the battle KG 3 had a total of 108 bombers, of which 88 were combat ready. KG 3 operated during all phases of the battle. In March 1941 II. Gruppe left for bases in Poland. During their relocation the unit stopped at Oldenburg for conversion onto the Ju 88 which was completed on 16 March. The rest of the Geschwader had converted to the Ju 88 by early June 1941.

During 1941–44 KG 3 flew raids against Britain and anti-shipping missions in support of the U-Boats during the Battle of the Atlantic campaign. In February 1942 IV.(Erg)./KG 3 assisted the German warships Scharnhorst and Gneisenau in their famous "Channel Dash".[2]

From July 1944 to January 1945 the Luftwaffe air-launched approximately 1,176 V-1 flying bombs from modified Heinkel He 111 H-22s of III./KG 3 and KG 53 (based in the Netherlands) flying over the North Sea. Research after the war estimated a 40% failure rate of air-launched V-1s, and the He-111s were extremely vulnerable to night fighter attack, as the launch lit up the area around the aircraft for several seconds.

Yugoslavia and Greece III./KG 3 retained some of its Do 17s and had 28 on strength during it operations in the Balkans. Under the command of Luftflotte 4 it participated in the bombing of Belgrade. After the surrender of the Yugoslavs it supported the defeat of the Greek and British in mainland Greece and then during the Battle of Crete.

During the initial phase of the war in the east KG 3 participated in the Battle of Kiev and was credited with 450 aircraft on the ground, its gunners were credited with 21 aircraft shot down in aerial combat, 30 tanks, 488 vehicles, 349 rail cars, seven armoured trains, 27 artillery positions, and 14 bridges.[3] The unit supported all three German Army Groups on the Eastern Front. When the Luftwaffe lost air superiority in summer of 1943 the Geschwaders losses stood at over 70 aircrews on the central sector of the front.[4] From January - June 1943 KG 3 formed a Train busting Staffel, 9.(Eis)/KG 3, using Ju 88Cs. It operated into June with success, its fate is unknown, it was probably disbanded in late 1943. 15.(Kroat.)/KG 3 was a unit made up of Croatian volunteers flying the Dornier Do 17Z, which saw action on the eastern front until 1944. On 14 October 1943 the unit took part in a short strategic bombing campaign in Russia. USAAF formations had been flying shuttle missions to Soviet territory after bombing German targets. The operation, named Zaunkönig, struck at American airfields in Russia, as well as Soviet targets. KG 53 and KG 55 took part in the attack, destroying some 44 B-17 bombers and damaging 26 others. Another 15 fighters were also destroyed. However, the Soviets began Operation Bagration soon after, and the Kampfgeschwaders switched back to supporting ground forces.[5] Most of the units Gruppes were disbanded by October 1944. It appears the last unit, 14.(Eis)/KG 3 was disbanded on 4 March 1945, its remaining personnel went to KG 76.

References

  1. ^ de Zeng et al. 2007, p. 36, 37, 38, 42
  2. ^ de Zeng et al. Vol 1, 2007, p. 45.
  3. ^ Cite error: The named reference de Zeng et al. 2007, p. 36 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  4. ^ de Zeng et al. 2007, p. 40.
  5. ^ Bergstrom 2008, p. 33.