Talk:Kami, Perempuan

Kami, Perempuan has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: December 14, 2013. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Kami, Perempuan appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 November 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Kami, Perempuan, a 1943 stage play by Armijn Pane, has been read as both promoting and warning against PETA?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2013/November. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kami, Perempuan.

Wikipedia

Indonesia Low‑importance

	Indonesia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Theatre Low‑importance

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article references a source that one of the article's contributors wrote or published. Citing oneself is allowed on Wikipedia, but may represent a conflict of interest. Contributors should be careful not to place undue weight on their own work, and are discouraged from excessive self-citation. Guidelines relevant to this situation include Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and WP:SELFPUBLISHED.

Crisco 1492 (talk · contribs) — Woodrich, Chris (March 2013). "Nilai Nasionalisme yang Terkandung dalam Kami, Perempuan Karya Armijn Pane: Kajian Poskolonial". Sintesis (in Indonesian). 7 (1): 14–21. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |trans_title= ignored (|trans-title= suggested) (help)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Kami, Perempuan/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Taylor Trescott (talk · contribs) 03:16, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll give this a look. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 03:16, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I will try and check daily (on a semi-wikibreak right now). — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:54, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On first pass this looks very solid, and easily will pass the GA criteria after these comments are addressed.

"There discussion is interrupted" Should this be "Their"?

Facepalm D'oh! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:12, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Kami, Perempuan premiered in 1943 in Jakarta." Didn't you say it opened in 1943 in the last paragraph? This seems repetetive

1 April 1943 was the office's date of opening. Reworded. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:12, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Pane collected ... collection of his stage plays" Could we use a different word for the first "collected"? Maybe "included" or something along the lines of that.

Agree and done. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:12, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Another, smaller, change..." I don't think we need these commas.

If there was no "smaller" I would agree, but with smaller the commas indicate that smaller here does not apply to the previous change. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:12, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In this article you write "Rd. Ariffien" but the actual article on him says "Rd Ariffien" without the period. Is there a correct way of writing his name?

Raden (which the Rd stands for) is an honorific, so writing is dependent on stylistic conventions (his article is at Rd because that's how he was generally credited in his works). Since this article is supposed to be using British English, I have cut the full stop. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:12, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's it, congratulations on making an interesting article on a subject that I hadn't heard of before. Seeing as how you're on an understandable wikibreak I have no problems putting this on hold for a while. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 00:17, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:12, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- No problem. Promoting to GA. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 22:29, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]