Talk:Kamasutra: The Revenge

India: Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Film: Indian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

Untitled

This whole article sounds like it was written by an Indian. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.179.39.8 (talk) 13:30, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lists

Are the long lists on this page really necessary? Most of the individuals listed do not have their own Wikipedia page and for some reason they are listed in bold. I was going to take the time to go ahead and remove all of the unnecessary bold text but it might be worth it to just remove the lists themselves as they are overwhelming and unnecessary. Let me know what you think. If we can reach a general consensus on this issue, I will go ahead and remove the content. Meatsgains (talk) 05:35, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree - the crew list, for example, is excessively detailed and unreferenced. Ruby Murray 08:41, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Ruby Murray:, If we can get another user to agree with us then I will move forward with the removal. Thanks! Meatsgains (talk) 04:15, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree - the crew list, for example, is excessively detailed and unreferenced and can be completely removed. We should only add things which a layman wants to know getting into unnecessary details complicate the issue..Vaibhav.times (talk) 10:20, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Vaibhav.times: I went ahead and removed a significant amount from the lists. Feel free to add some content back in or remove more. Meatsgains (talk) 16:40, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Meatsgains:i just spoke to the official people looking after the Kamasutra 3d and will propely format the whole page after their consent, please do help me in case i do something wrong thanksVaibhav.times (talk) 16:48, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I improve the basic formatting of the page , hope this help, feel free to edit, remove or add anything Vaibhav.times (talk) 17:38, 13 February 2014 (UTC) User Ncrppl wasted all my efforts of formatting the article and cleaning it upVaibhav.times (talk) 08:51, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Vaibhav.times:, you wrote twice above (13 Feb. ) that you agreed that the unreferenced and excessively detailed list should be removed. Yet you later restored it, after you "spoke to the official people looking after the Kamasutra 3d". What's going on? Ruby Murray 13:24, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Ruby Murray:Sorry what do u mean by spoke to official people, i said i checked with them about the cast and other details, nothing that i am working on their behalf or representing them here. I added them back after cleaning up the whole movie page ..If you can see that i clean up the whole movie page and put relevant stuff under different sub heads. In case you think i have done something wrong you can remove it and everyone is free to edit it back as per general consensus. I feel that you have taken this page as personal and hell bound on deleting each and everything and edit it as per your wish. You are far more experienced and have full authority to do whatever you wish to do but please don't question someone's credibility182.64.13.73 (talk) 15:22, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please read what you wrote above. In this edit, you wrote "i just spoke to the official people looking after the Kamasutra 3d and will propely format the whole page after their consent". Ruby Murray 15:26, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Ruby Murray:Yes i said that but does that mean i will represent them? , i am a journalist have years of experience writing for Movies and other stuff. As per my knowledge taking consent/ seeking information from official people is the way to be more accurate with the records. As i have already told you that you are far more experienced than me and have full authority to do anything and even delete all irrelevant stuff. I rest my case here, i will do whatever i feel like is right, if you think that my credibility is suspicious, you can go ahead and report thanksVaibhav.times (talk) 15:36, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't accuse you of anything. I asked you why you wrote twice that the list should be completely removed, and then suddenly changed your mind and restored it all, after speaking offline with employees of the company. Seems like a perfectly reasonable question. Ruby Murray 15:39, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I will once again remove the 'Crew' list as it does not belong. I discussed this with Vaibhav.times on my talk page and the user did not respond. First off, the 'Crew' list doesn't include sources from which the information was pulled from. Second, because there are no sources to support it, it lacks legitimacy.

We can get a better understanding of whether or not the list should be included by looking at other similar films. Below is a list of the top 10 Bollywood films of 2014. Not one of the pages from that list below includes a 'Crew' section.

There is no need for Kamasutra 3D to have a 'Crew' section especially without references. Feel free to find me an Indian Film page on Wikipedia that includes a 'Crew' section. If you do, then we will definitely consider adding the list back. Best, Meatsgains (talk) 17:42, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Synopsis

how this is incoherent marketing fluff? can you elaborate, it is suppose to be synopsis on the movie "Set in the backdrop of the ancient, Kamasutra 3D is the journey of a soulful love embodied with betrayal and war. It weaves the transformative changes in body, mind and soul by the forbidden world of sexual love and sensuality.", sorry i guess you cleared my thoughts i used to think them synopsis , but they are actually "incoherent marketing fluff". Anyways i am out of it will edit whatever i feel like. Thanks for your time and sorry if i offended you anyhow. Vaibhav.times (talk) 15:47, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't offended me. But it's a verbatim quote of the company's own senseless marketing fluff, currently spammed all over the internet in the usual places. What does "the backdrop of the ancient" mean? What does "a soulful love embodied with betrayal and war" mean? If you've actually seen the film and want to write a synopsis, please remember that we have to write contributions in our own words, and from a WP:Neutral point of view. Ruby Murray 15:57, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]