Jump to content

Talk:Kamal Siddiqi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Kamal Siddiqi. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:29, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thoughts on deletion

[edit]

@VegasCasinoKid, SwisterTwister, Worldbruce, VanEman, Hobit, LibStar, and Chrisw80: (Tagging everyone who was involved at the AfD) I realised that the AfD was closed with no consensus. I had voted keep at that time, but I am having second thoughts now after seeing subsequent comments on it. Although the subject of the article is the Editor of a major newspaper in Pakistan, I had overlooked the fact that notability is not inherited. At the moment, I can only find one source [1] which covers the subject in detail. All others sources are indeed trivial mentions made in the context of an event affecting the newspaper where the subject was quoted simply because he is the editor. Looking at the references available, I doubt the article can be improved. I would propose that any information relevant to the newspaper be added to The Express Tribune and this article either be deleted or redirected to the The Express Tribune. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 19:04, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'm pretty happy with that one source and would prefer to not merge the article. But I don't think a merger is clearly the wrong thing either and if consensus leans that way I'll not be upset. Thanks for following up. Hobit (talk) 19:36, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's good to see editors open to reconsidering a position. Since there was nothing wrong with procedure in the deletion discussion, I suggest doing nothing for a while. Re-evaluate notability in six months. If a fresh search for solid sources doesn't produce results you find convincing, propose a merge and redirect to The Express Tribune. That's an outcome I could get behind. --Worldbruce (talk) 19:52, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kamal Siddiqi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:00, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]