Talk:Kakuzi Limited
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
The article lead contains risk of advertisement.
The last section of the article lacks substantial sources pertaining to the content. Furthermore it contains multiple biased elements such as "unsubstantiated allegations", "progressive milestones", "This is the right thing to do for the benefit and protection of the community" and "progressively adopting". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:1F:93C7:1E01:C0D6:B373:C66A:E490 (talk) 15:46, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
It is not from Uk reuters and it is written in my own word. Kacembepower (talk) 07:42, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for rephrasing the prose. I have made further edits to avoid the problems of a close paraphrase, and added some refs. I've removed the speedy deletion tag as well. If you have more material from reliable sources you can use to expand the article, please do go ahead and add more - just make sure to write in your own words and cite your sources. Gonzonoir (talk) 08:37, 17 June 2010 (UTC)