Talk:Kaj Ulrik Linderstrøm-Lang

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Genetics task force.

Denmark Mid‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Style

I have some issues with the writing style in this article. I don't think subjective and personal phrases such as wonderful and cool belong in an encyclopedia article. I rephrased cool, but I haven't removed wonderful, because I didn't have the references used. I suggest that however has the articles, WillowW?, tries to rephrase the most subjective parts... Kjaergaard 06:01, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, I'm sorry :( I sometimes get a little carrried away, and Linderstrom-Lang is one of my favorite scientists. But the memoirs of many of his direct students echo their admiration for his personality as well as his science. (I'll add a few more references shortly.) As an aside, I think he's a good role model for PI's ;)

Accuracy

Linderstrom-Lang didn't contribute quaternary structure. That was Bernal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.102.197.70 (talk) 21:14, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]