Jump to content

Talk:Kaiser Steel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kaiser Ventures. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:09, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Schematic drawing

[edit]

If I could find a schematic drawing of the original and later BOF lineup! This would make it much easier to understand the flow of material through the plant.-- Jackie Bensberg (talk) 18:47, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

no doubt it would. you are encouraged to undertake such a heroic improvement of the article. Nowakki (talk) 18:55, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Finished rewrite (Nov 2024)

[edit]

Just leaving a note for posterity that I've finished my pass over the article. I restructured it, tried to reconcile a lot of the nitty-gritty facts and figures, and add to the historical big picture. I leaned on the last chapter of Mike Davis' City of Quartz in particular (reading it was the primary reason I decided to expand this article). I'm going to go ahead and request an article re-evaluation too.

I decided against adding a To Do template, but I did put in a suggested reference list and media requests. Whoever wants to edit this article next, besides just going over my prose, I'd suggest further consolidating and reconciling the detailed business figures: adding inflation adjustments, organizing more facts into tables or charts, etc. Although Nowakki can't edit anymore, he has a lot of good details at his Commons page; they're very specific so you probably don't want to bring them over wholesale, but they can fill in a lot of gaps, especially if you're working on an infographic.

Besides that, the article definitely has room for more eye-candy. It may be worth moving some material into smaller related articles too (like Eagle Mountain, California or a new article for the Fontana USW Local 2869). Otherwise, happy editing and that's all folks. -- Zar2gar1 (talk) 19:32, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just to update, an independent reviewer decided to leave the article at C for now, mainly because references weren't precisely allocated to claims enough. I've mostly fixed that (we still have a couple spots needing a citation or verification), enough to qualify for B-class in my mind. However, I decided to leave at C-class too because for the size and topic, I don't feel we have enough supporting media, diagrams, etc. After adding some, I feel this can definitely be upped to a B-class, and may already be pretty close to A-class. -- Zar2gar1 (talk) 05:00, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A couple notes on some sources

[edit]

For posterity, I also have a couple observations about sources we cite in the article too:

  • For the operational details of the 4th blast furnace, there's a discrepancy between the local paper & the trade magazines on capacity. I think it comes from one of the sources assuming the 4th oven was built to the same specs as the first 3, which the trade magazines strongly imply isn't the case.
  • For the 1994 NY Times article, I decided to cut the specific claim about a $287 million cost. I don't think this reconciles with the trade magazines or Davis' claim (based on Kaiser Steel financial reports) that the $127 million emissions control was over half the expansion budget. I suspect the reporter was either actually referring to something other than the last expansion cost (e.g. book value of physical assets when sold to Vale?) or maybe made a transcription error (from $237 million?) -- Zar2gar1 (talk) 05:00, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]