Talk:Kaiser Franz Joseph I-class cruiser/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 04:03, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
I'll get to this shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 04:03, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- Failing as non-responsive.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:08, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Sturmvogel 66: Question: Was this even supposed to be a quick fail? The article is almost ripe for promotion. I know it's not your job to fix issues that may arise from a review, but ultimately, the purpose of the GA project is to help get articles to GA status. Please read the FAQs about inactive nominators. It seems like this article would have had very few issues during the review that a reviewer could have fixed on their own. Again, this is just a suggestion, but I wanted to bring it up for future reference. MX (✉ • ✎) 17:07, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
- Never even crossed my mind though it probably wouldn't have required much work.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:12, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Sturmvogel 66: Question: Was this even supposed to be a quick fail? The article is almost ripe for promotion. I know it's not your job to fix issues that may arise from a review, but ultimately, the purpose of the GA project is to help get articles to GA status. Please read the FAQs about inactive nominators. It seems like this article would have had very few issues during the review that a reviewer could have fixed on their own. Again, this is just a suggestion, but I wanted to bring it up for future reference. MX (✉ • ✎) 17:07, 11 December 2018 (UTC)