Jump to content

Talk:Kaidan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Shouldn't the lemma be Kaidan? We use Hepburn romanization of the post-war standard reading for all other Japanese terms, so for the sake of consistency this article should be moved. -- Mkill 04:08, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not about consistency or Hepburn romanization. Convention is to use the most common English speeling. The term comes from Lafcadio Hearn's book of the same name, which is never called "kaidan" - not even in Japan, where I assume kanji/hiragana is used - and which does not use the spelling "kaidan" except to specify the modern pronunciation, which has already been done on this article. There is no need to use the modern spelling when it is not as common in English. Admittedly, I have met people who were confused by this spelling and pronunciation, including myself and my native Japanese-speaking Japanese teacher, but this article as it is now already explains the resolution to the problem, which would be harder to do if it were moved and already used the modern spelling. This seems to be the exact opposite problem we had with Earless Hoichi/Hoichi the Earless, which was moved to conform to the more common (albeit old-fashioned) wording (which also came from this book), as per Wikipedia policy. elvenscout742 16:27, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article should definitely be re-labled as Kaidan. In Japan, as in elswhere the particular spelling of "Kwaidan" refers only to Hearn's book, and not to kaidan in general. It is one of the ways that Hearn's book is seperated from general kaidan.

Note the Japanese-language entry, where the reading is given as "kaidan" with a not that Hearn's book is different, labled "Kwaidan." (MightyAtom 16:18, 1 July 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Kwaidan

[edit]

To whoever put in the section about "Kwaidan" being an error resulting from Hearn's poor grasp of Japanese: it's not. The word actually did used to have kw in it—the language itself has changed since and lost the w. The same thing happened to Kwannon. --Ptcamn 11:57, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I second that. The now non-existant syllable is sometimes written with a syllable otherwise in use only when writting some Okinawan words - a "ku" followed by a small "wa". TomorrowTime 14:44, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed. The "kw" prnounciation is mostly gone in modern Japanese but it historically existed, and remains in some names such as Kwansei Gakuin University. —Tokek 09:48, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This has been resolved, an editor put in Kaidan (sometimes translated as Kwaidan) under my suggestion. I do not believe Kwaidan just refers to Hearns book, but considering that Kaidan is the modern Japanese spelling we should list both. Yojimbo501 (talk) 22:51, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kaidan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:15, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kaidan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:52, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kaidan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:07, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Kaidan which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 10:37, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I just thought I'd comment. The assertion that "Kwaidan" is a deprecated transliteration term in favour of "Kaidan" is not sourced, nor is there context providing an explanation in English or Japanese as to whether it has fallen out of favour of "Kaidan" or is in concurrent use along with "Kaidan", other then "Hepburn system now uses Kaidan". In the absence of verifiability, I can see a point of view arguing that the title of the primary topic should be "Kwaidan" instead. Haleth (talk) 16:50, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: JPN 351 The Japanese Experience of the Twentieth Century

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 10 January 2022 and 30 April 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tyjknott (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Dslaym (talk) 13:57, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Kaidan&oldid=1207891814"