Talk:Kai Tak Tunnel

Hong Kong Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (22)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (60) • B-Class articles (290)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (1,046)

Image needed (348)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (5,463) • Stub-Class articles (6,712)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (390) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,342)

Bridges and Tunnels Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rename to Kai Tak Tunnel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was move. —Nightst a llion (?) 07:00, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't we move this to "Kai Tak Tunnel"? Or keep it as it is because the name "Airport Tunnel" is the most commonly used? --D e ryc k C. 14:42, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support move - Taiwan used to be called Formosa mostly, now it's not. My point: conventions change over time. Stick with its official name. deadkid_dk 15:25, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support Gryffindor 17:12, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Airport tunnel is a poor choice for the article name. The airport tunnel in Las Vegas shares that name, I'm sure there are many others. Vegaswikian 22:37, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Simply because the tunnel is officially renamed. Spring Dennis 07:10, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support, (as nom, perhaps?) - to Vegaswikian: even if the page is moved and the airport tunnel is LV is added as another article, disambiguation is necessary because Hongkongers never stopped calling it Airport Tunnel though it's officially renamed. --Deryck C. 15:57, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It's notable that the Chinese version of this article has been moved to Kai Tak Tunnel already. --D e ryc k C. 15:58, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I have no objection to adding a Dab after the article is moved. In fact this seems like it should be required as a part of this vote. If you add the dab, the vegas tunnel article is Nevada State Route 171. Vegaswikian 19:19, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The entrance from about Ma-tau-kok and Ma-tau-chung

There are not few fire stations in the Kwun-tong districts,
it is why the fire services in Kwun-tong only needs Kowloon Bay tunnel from Ma-tau-chung fire station,
if AND ONLY if EVERY fire resources from Kwun-tong are engaged at a time.
In principles, ALMOST NO fire or ambulence accidents are engaging the whole fire services in a district.
Therefore, it is NO BUSINESS to let the entrance as title unavailable to public at most of the time.
In the other words, this entrance is now needed to be re-opened to public. 182.239.113.0 (talk) 10:11, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]