Talk:Kahlia Hogg

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Australia: Soccer Low‑importance

	Australia portal Kahlia Hogg is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Australian soccer task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Women's sport: WOSO Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Women's association football portal This article is supported by the Women's football / soccer task force.

Football: American & Canadian / Women's football Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American and Canadian soccer task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	Women's association football portal This article is supported by the women's football task force (assessed as Low-importance).

relevance of club's record

@Hmlarson: I saw you added the record of Canberra United last season, when Hogg played 2 games. Why is the club's WDL record relevant to the player's page? (especially as she only played 2 games) --SuperJew (talk) 05:39, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why is it not relevant? Hmlarson (talk) 06:15, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As it is the record of the club she played for (which includes all the players), and not necessarily a reflection of her contributions. I could see the relevance if it was a vital player in the club's run, say the captain or a top goalscorer who played every game, but as she only played 2 matches... (kind of like how the internet made fun of Schwarzer when he won Premier League medals with Leicester and Chelsea despite not playing at all) --SuperJew (talk) 06:23, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've worked on several GA articles that include this. I think it's relevant and should remain. It looks like since this article was expanded 5x the size in the last five days, it's eligible for DYK on the homepage. Do you have any interest in that? Template talk:Did you know Hmlarson (talk) 20:40, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, if you say it's something common in good articles. --SuperJew (talk) 16:09, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm does she have a good hook for DYK? --SuperJew (talk) 16:10, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You can check the Recognized Content tab in the WP:WOSO for some inspiration or just keep in mind for future new or expanded articles. The timing is important as it's something like within 5 days that it can be submitted. Hmlarson (talk) 22:11, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]