Talk:Kabandha/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 20:01, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
- Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 20:01, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Overall summary
[edit]GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
An interesting discussions of the various sagas containing the stories of Kabandha.
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- Well referenced.
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- Well referenced.
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Well illustrated.
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Well illustrated.
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
I'm awardding this article GA-status. Congratulations on providing an intersting discussion of the various sagas concerning the stories of Kabandha. Pyrotec (talk) 20:49, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks. I never imagined this would be a GA, before being a DYK. --Redtigerxyz Talk 02:59, 24 April 2010 (UTC)