Talk:K League decentralization policy

Please do not rollback to the old document which is lack of citations

1. Title : The correct title of this article must be 'Complete Region-base Policy' in K League because that is the official title of the policy. On the page 178 of K League 30th Anniversary, the official book from K League mentioned "Region-base Policy Implemented" ahead of 1996 K League Season. Also Korea Football Association website's page on K League history, it says in 1996, K League implemented its 'Complete Region-base Policy' which is a complemented policy of previous 'Region-base Policy'".
   
2. Citations : Too many sentences are without citations. The parts must be deleted as there is no citation are as below - basically most part of the article.
   
   1. KFA and Korea Professional Football League officials were impressed with the J-League's disapproval of using National Olympic Stadium (Tokyo) and,
      
   2. they were looking to implement a similar policy in the K-League
      
   3. This warranted the construction of a soccer-specific stadium in Seoul.
      
   4. While the KFA and Korea Professional Football League wanted to spread football fever to the provinces - I see the references from official K League 30th Anniversary book, the website and KFA website are consistently mentioning as K League's motivation to implement 'Complete Region-base Policy'.
      
   5. This did not go down well with the affected clubs, which did not want to recognize the K-League's decentralization policy.
      
   6. Eventually, it necessitated the Korean government issuing an eviction order to the three clubs - the first reference is in breach of copyright law, as the editor linked to a private blog which taken photo of 'Best Eleven' magazine in South Korea. See Wikipedia:Citing_sources#When_not_to_cite.
      
   7. However, the government did guarantee that if the clubs built a soccer-specific stadium in Seoul, they could have a Seoul franchise and return to the city.
      
   8. Anyang LG Cheetahs were allowed to return to Seoul and the new Seoul World Cup Stadium at the cost of a small share of the construction fees (which turned out to be 15 billion wons, or at that time 15 million USD - the 4th reference doesn't contain any of 15 billion wons nor they are allowed to move to Seoul. The article says "Anyang LG is the first club which officially states its intention to move to Seoul while the city of Seoul is seeking the tenant among the existing professional clubs.서울시가 기존 프로구단을 대상으로 연고지 이전 공모를 하고 있는 가운데 서울입성을 공식적으로 밝힌 것은 안양 LG가 처음이다.".
      
   9. The league expanded by three teams by 2004 to fill the vacant stadiums with the Korean military owned Gwangju Sangmu and municipally owned Daegu FC and Incheon United. Bucheon SK finally moved from the Seoul Capital Area to the last remaining vacant football stadium for FIFA World Cup, Jeju World Cup Stadium, in 2006.
      
3. Structure : The article structure is too plain. 3 clubs affected by 'Complete Region-base Policy' in 1996, therefore 3 different sub-titles will be useful to add the details.
   

Hope you understand.
Kingkenny1967 (talk) 07:00, 25 February 2017 (AEDT)

Citiations: Most of sentences are translation of Korean version with citiations. But this article just had important citiaions. Just adding citiations.Footwiks (talk)

I Improved the Structure in way you want.Footwiks (talk) 15:51, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 25 February 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Jenks24 (talk) 06:17, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

---

Decentralization policy in K League → K League Complete Region-based Policy – As above reasons, I moved the page with the requested name but the page name has been modified with no talk at all. Hereby I request this document to be renamed as 'K League Complete Region-based Policy' and protected from the further vandalism.
Statistically, searching in Naver News Library[1]., which is a Digital archive of 4 major news papers in South Korea: Kyunghyang Shinmun, The Dong-a Ilbo, Maeil Business Newspaper, and The Hankyoreh, 'Decentralization policy in K League'프로축구 서울 공동화 정책 or partial search has 0 result. Meanwhile, K League Region-based Policy프로축구 지역연고제 or K League Complete Region-based Policy프로축구 완전지역연고제 show 47 results.[2] Out of 47 results, The 1996 implementation of the policy which this document is describing - moving of 3 professional football clubs out of Seoul is covered up in 1996.[3] The quote "Also K League let the teams in Seoul to move out, LG decided to choose among Changwon, Daejeon or Anyang, Ilhwa will confirm after 16th of March."

References

Also please regard that the document descriptions I made before was full of citations, unlike the current document with too many sentences without citations. Kingkenny1967 (talk) 09:42, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

• Totly Oppose Term-K League Complete Region-based Policy is konglish by direct translation from the Korean word-완전지역연고제. K League front office also don't use Term-K League Complete Region-based Policy in English K League article. K League Complete Region-based Policy is a kind of korean style franchise system name.

But this article is about relocation policy of 3 football clubs based in Seoul. Focus on relocation all 3 clubs in Seoul to other cities by force. Not about K League's overall franchise system. Therefore K League Complete Region-based Policy is not suitable for this article title.

And Kingkenny also requested moving of Korean Wikipedia. From Decentralization policy in K League(서울연고공동화정책) to K League Complete Region-based Polic(완전지역연고제). But He agreed to keep artilce name - Decentralization policy in K League(서울연고공동화정책) in Korean Wikipedia

Finaly, Term-Decentralization policy in K League much more notable and this term was used in FIFA News before the creating of this article and frequntley used in English K League Books. But Term-K League Complete Region-based Policy was created by Kingkenny1967 in order to move title of this article just 1 day ago.

• FIFA News
  

http://www.fifa.com/news/y=2009/m=6/news=winged-horses-flying-high-1075832.html

• The Sports Business in The Pacific Rim: Economics and Policy
  

https://books.google.co.kr/books?id=9gYjBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA64&lpg=PA64&dq=Decentralization+policy+in+K+League&source=bl&ots=-kxcsNMN84&sig=goZvvBmgcO0RZUuXDI3JIm1QmCk&hl=ko&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwioo4yi0avSAhVBkpQKHUdxBzoQ6AEIMzAE#v=onepage&q=Decentralization%20policy%20in%20K%20League&f=false

• K-SPORTS: A New Breed of Rising Champions
  

https://books.google.co.kr/books?id=ZAFqBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA85&lpg=PA85&dq=Decentralization+policy+in+K+League&source=bl&ots=YCIndlSxHF&sig=BNDFGx-lMFkRUycrswS-mGF4WSc&hl=ko&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj16sGEzavSAhUGI5QKHe6WAJUQ6AEIQjAH#v=onepage&q=Decentralization%20policy%20in%20K%20League&f=false

Footwiks (talk) 16:38, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

• Oppose You cannot literally translate something into English, the current title is fine and logical Snowflake91 (talk) 17:42, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

• Oppose current name is logical. This document have a lot of evidence that can prove current title. Rodrigo 0000 (talk) 11:51, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

It's awkward that there is NO document in 1990s mentioning 'Decentralization Policy' AT ALL and K League didn't use the term in K League 30th Anniversary for the description of Seoul clubs moving out in 1996, but K League used the term ONLY ONCE on 307 page in the same book - the FC Seoul page, therefore it is a correct name. Thank you for your clarifications. Kingkenny1967 (talk) 23:39, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

• This article is about relocation of 3 club based in Seoul. Please decribe about K League Complete Region-based Policy on Franchise System paragraph at K League articleFootwiks (talk) 14:14, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Policy attribute - Compulsary v Voluntary

There is a person who is trying to put 'compulsory' title to the main sentence. This is not a compulsory policy - K League 30th Annivesary. Seoul, South Korea: K League. 2013. p. 178. ISBN 9788996317845 said "3 clubs agreed". After the agreement, there are turmoils but the agreement was made among KFA and 3 Seoul clubs. Kingkenny1967 (talk) 02:12, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

K League 30th Annivesary BOOK 307P-Direct discription of this policy, said This policy was done by K League and South Korean Government and By this policy, 3 clubs are relocated. There isn't any description of club's voluntary will and agreement. Key point is that This policy was invented and implemented by K League and South Korean Government.

Article 1996년 1월 2일 2002년 월드컵 대회 개최국 선정을 앞두고 한국프로축구연맹과 정부는 서울 연고 공동화 정책을 시행했다. 월드컵 유치를 위해 전국적인 프로축구 열기 확산과 주요 16개 도시의 축구전용구장 건설이 목표였다. 이 정책에 따라 서울 동대문운동장을 홈구장으로 사용했던 일화 천마 프로축구단, 유공 코끼리 프로축구단, LG 치타스 프로축구단은 천안, 부천, 안양으로 연고지를 이전했다.

Please don't misunderstood. Agreement that you mentioned is just to accept execution of compulsory relocation order. Not mean that 3 clubs wanted to relocate spontaneously. 3 clubs had disobeyed policy in 1995. Therefore, South Korean Goverment ordered compulsory relocation again in 1995 October

Overally, This policy was definately compulsy. If you're right. Why did South Korean Govorment order relocaiton again?

Also There are reliable references about compulsory policy.

(1) Korean Sports News Pape: Sports Seoul said 한국프로축구연맹의 3개팀의 연고이전을 강행했다. 강행 means 강제(强制)로 시행(行)하다 = compulsory enforcement. http://www.fntoday.co.kr/bbs/list.html?table=bbs_219&idxno=94642&page=192&total=3877&sc_area=&sc_word=
(2) The Sports Business in The Pacific Rim: Economics and Policy said - K League also established decentralization, which forced all three clubs in Seoul to move to other cities. https://books.google.co.kr/books?id=9gYjBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA64&lpg=PA64&dq=Decentralization+policy+in+K+League&source=bl&ots=-kxcsNMN84&sig=goZvvBmgcO0RZUuXDI3JIm1QmCk&hl=ko&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwioo4yi0avSAhVBkpQKHUdxBzoQ6AEIMzAE#v=onepage&q=Decentralization%20policy%20in%20K%20League&f=false

Generally Professaional sports team relocation are done by sports teams' free will. But this relocation was done by K League and South Korean Government will. This is very important point of this article and compulsory or compell, forced - These words are key word of this article.

If you want to remove word compulsory or compell, force. Prove that Overally, 3 clubs were relocated voluntarily with reference. I can't find any reference which 3 clubs moved out voluntarily like Los Angeles Rams relocation Footwiks (talk)

[IMG]http://i66.tinypic.com/30jnzb4.jpg[/IMG]

K League 30th Annivesary. Seoul, South Korea: K League. 2013. p. 178. ISBN 9788996317845

(Red Box)"And 3 clubs in Seoul agreed to the decision,"

As simple as that. Kingkenny1967 (talk) 08:22, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Comment: Self-published source like K League anniversary book is not reliable in this case since they will be biased toward their own decision and will try to avoid words like "cumpolsory", "forced" etc., what about neutral sources like newspapers? Snowflake91 (talk) 10:12, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Comment Hey, it's in Sportsseoul. Thanks to Footwiks citation, I found the sentence from the news he mentioned.

6 Nov 1995 Sports Seoul http://ikfhs.tistory.com/entry/%EC%84%9C%EC%9A%B8%EC%97%B0%EA%B3%A0%EA%B3%B5%EB%8F%99%ED%99%94%EC%A0%95%EC%B1%85

프로축구연맹은 최근 청와대로부터 서울 3팀의 연고지이전지침을 직접 하달받고 각 해당구단에 이같은 청와대의 의지를 전달한 것으로 알려졌다.

"It is known that K League have been directly given the guideline of moving the 3 teams in Seoul from Blue House and they delivered the determination of the Blue House to these clubs."

일화, 유공, LG 등 서울 3팀은 지난 2월 프로축구연맹 1차 이사회의 결정에 따라 모두 서울을 떠나기로 합의해 놓고도 아직까지 뚜렷한 이전계획을 내놓지 않았을 뿐더러 심지어 일부 구단은 최근 다시 서울에 눌러앉겠다는 입장을 공공연히 되풀이해 주위의 눈총을 받아왔다.

"These 3 teams in Seoul - Ilhwa, Yukong and LG are all agreed to move out from Seoul as per the decision from K League committee's 1st meeting in Feb this year, but still they didn't project any certain transfer plan. Even some of them have been eyesores as they publicly reverted to their stance to stay in Seoul."

Kingkenny1967 (talk) 11:29, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Reply:All these 3 clubs have been the part of K League committee who agreed to execute this policy.

It's in line with their own decision, as per below links.

"서울지역에 연고를 둔 일화 유공 LG도 수도권으로 연고구장을 옮기려는 움직임을 보이고 있어 귀추가 주목 된다."

"일화.유공.LG도 서울을 탈피,수도권 도시를 새 연고지로 변경을 검토하고 있다."

The 'resistance' could be coming AFTER the agreement, but there is no deny about the agreement itself. The 3 teams had never shown the deny against the agreement itself. Kingkenny1967 (talk) 14:15, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

No, No, In this case, Agreement is not important. According to below article, K League Front Officie said, If 3 clubs don't agree the decision, We force them out of K League, Send in agreement and relocation plan document to K League Front Office. 프로축구 지역연고 먼길인가? 서울 연고 구단들이 연말까지 서울을 떠나지 않을 경우 내년 시즌 프로리그에 참여시키지 않는다는 내부방침을 세우고 각 구단에서 서울 이전 계획서 제출을 요구하는 공문을 발송했다.

Do you know Comfort women? Comfort women's actions also had nominal agreement including contract document. Using your logic, Their actions are not compulsory, Are their actions voluntarily? Therefore, Do you want to remove word forced in this article? Comfort women were women and girls forced into sexual slavery by the Imperial Japanese Army in occupied territories before and during World War

About compulsory policy, There are more reliable and detaild sources from third party press with neutral point of view.

(3) 축구와 야구의 차이, 그리고 연고의식 이 과정에서 프로축구연맹은 서울의 공동화를 위해 당시 서울에 있던 세 팀 LG, 유공, 일화를 강제연고이전시켰다.

(4) 서울 연고 이랜드프로축구단 출범…FC서울과 '투톱' 1996년 정부의 강압적인 ‘서울 연고 공동화(空洞化) 정책’으로 한때 프로축구 불모지로 전락했던 수도 서울이 다시 축구의 중심지로 거듭날지 주목된다.

95년까지 서울을 연고로 한 축구단은 일화 천마(현 성남FC), LG 치타스(현 FC서울), 유공 코끼리(현 제주 유나이티드) 등 3개였다. 하지만 정부가 2002년 월드컵 유치 활동과 맞물려 지방 축구 활성화를 내세우며 3개 프로축구단의 연고지를 강제로 다른 지역으로 이전시켰다. 유공 코끼리는 부천, 일화 천마는 천안, LG 치타스는 안양으로 옮겼다.

Your references's time is in 1994. It's meaningless. The 3 teams shown the deny against relocation decision. (Please make a signature)

(1) October 1995, Yukong said, If we move out from Seoul forcibly, We can dissolve the club.

(2) November 1995, 3 clubs resisted severly, K League can't solve this issue internally. So Blue House issuee relocation orders

(3) November 1995, K League said. If 3 clubs don't agree the decision, We force them out of K League, Send in agreement and relocation plan document to K League Front
Footwiks (talk)

Comment I don't get it that why it is 'meaningless' that 1994 article. I see it as from 1994, 3 clubs in Seoul had been regarding moving out Seoul. Early 1996, they agreed to move but after the agreement, Yukong was reluctant to execute the agreement. LG joined them. AND KFA and Korean government forced them to keep their agreement. Is it oppressive? LOL When you breach your contact and didn't execute as per the agreement, and the law enforcement make you to do it - you don't call it oppressive. It's you who made the troubles. Kingkenny1967 (talk) 12:16, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

July 1994, K Leageu was planing to move out 3 clubs. From this time, 3 clubs were under pressure. It's definatly oppressive. LOL~ All people and company can break agreement and contract. If you made employment contract, Can't you resign? Once made employment contract, Do you work like slave in all whole life?

Footwiks (talk) 14:44, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Please present references that support your opinion. There are many references that support this policy is compulsory neutrally, Many reliable sources conclude. This policy was Compulsory. Please read newspaper (1), (2), (3), (4) again.

Where are your referecnes?? Footwiks (talk)

Then what do you mean by saying "After you win the discussion" in the edit comments? These articles are talking about after the agreement. None of them saying the agreement was not made or the clubs forced to made the agreement. Kingkenny1967 (talk) 12:50, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Comment: DO NOT remove the agreement part and put 'compulsory' in the main sentence. I am warning you. Kingkenny1967 (talk) 12:29, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Comment: Hey you can't even make gramatically correct sentences in English. If you want to change descriptions, I suggest mediation. Do you agree with it? Kingkenny1967 (talk) 12:47, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Comment: Per WP:NPOV, we should avoid using words like "forced" etc., especially in the lead section; however, it needs to be mentioned in the article that the clubs didnt agree with reloaction and resisted, but avoid words like forced and compulsory, even if the government actually kicked them out of the city. Snowflake91 (talk) 13:23, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Comment These articles are talking about compulsory relocation by Goverment and K League. Not gernerall relocation by club or team's free will like Saint Luis Rams => LA Rams. As I told you before, Nominal agreement is not important in this Policy. Comfort Women's action had also nominal agreement, Besides Comport Women received salary. Using your logic, Their actions are not compulsory, Are their actions voluntarily? 3 Clubs agreed relocation unavoidably in January 1996,

Because South Korean Government issued relocation order and K League announced that They will be excluded from the K League in October 1995. Actually, The 3 clubs were forced to surrender. Therefore, After comprehensive evaluation of this policy, Many South korean newspaper and English Books with Neutral point of view inculde force, compell, compulsory. If the agreement is very important part of this policy, So 3 Clubs moved out voluntarily. Why did south korean newspaper article include word Compulsory, Forced, Compell? Where is newspaper article which focus on agreement and spontaneity? If you want to remove compulsy, I don't want to spend time to wordplay. Present newspapers articles which focus on agreement and spontaneity? Footwiks (talk)

Reply First of all, K League committee, who wrote the agreement of moving clubs out of Seoul, is inclusive of the chief of these three Seoul clubs. Therefore, the decision of the committee reflected the opinions of these affected clubs.

Ref 1. 프로축구연맹은 프로리그 7개구단 단장 등 10명을 대의원으로 행정과 재정,기획,홍보 등을 축구협회와 별도로 총괄하게 된다.

Secondly, these three clubs were considering to move out from Seoul voluntarily as per below citation. The subject of 'considering move out from Seoul' of this articles are Ilhwa, Yukong and LG.

Ref 2. 일화.유공.LG도 서울을 탈피,수도권 도시를 새 연고지로 변경을 검토하고 있다.

Then, on 13 Feb 1995, K League Committee which is inclusive of the Chief Executives from all 3 Seoul clubs, announced that these 3 clubs will move out of Seoul on 1 Jan 1996, leaving Seoul as 'Joint Area for all 8 clubs'.

Ref 3. 프로연맹은 현재 3개구단이 공동으로 소유하는 서울 연고권이 지역연고제 정착에 문제점이라는데 의견을 같이하고 내년 1월1일자로 서울을 8개구단공동지역으로 두고 3개구단의 연고를 타지역으로 옮기기로했다.

And then all the turmoils you have mentioned were followed.

Further to that, it is obvious that 공동화 means 'making it joint area' due to mentioning 8 clubs - 8개구단공동지역. If it means 'emptying' 공동화, they can't put '8 clubs' in front of it.

Kingkenny1967 (talk) 01:36, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Comment: I think this policy is compulsory. In Korean wikipedia, this policy is compulsory by final conclusion after discussion. And the documentation have a lot of evidence regarding the compulsory policy.

Comment: Yes you can think. 'by the final conclusion' - do you understand Wikipedia system?

If you have the evidences, please bring it here. Kingkenny1967 (talk) 10:55, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

In 1994, KPFL(Korean Professional Football League) announced they had a plan to relocate about LG, Yukong, Ilhwa based in Seoul.

In same year, KPFL announced they had a plan to implement this policy by force if three clubs based in Seoul didn't select their hometown. It meant Seoul clubs didn't have their right of choice.

This policy was supported by Blue House. In 1995, Blue House gave KPFL guidelines about relocating three clubs from Seoul to another city. Finally, Seoul clubs had no choice but to relocate another city because Blue House's guidelines is very powerful. So they couldn't refuse this compulsory policy.

I'd like to give a question to everyone. Do you think three clubs based in Seoul relocated voluntarily or compulsory from Seoul where it's the biggest and capital city in South Korea to another city such as Anyang, Bucheon, Cheonan where it's a satellite city of Seoul? For reference, because of dissatisfaction about their past hometown, LG relocated from Chungcheong to Seoul voluntarily in 1990 and Yukong relocated from Incheon/Gyeonggi to Seoul voluntarily in 1991. Meanwhile, Ilhwa selected Seoul in 1989 when they founded. From a common sense point of view, this policy's attribute is compulsory. Rodrigo 0000 (talk) 07:47, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Comment: I have been expecting you, Rodrigo a.k.a. 'the Seoul Pair' with footwiki. You guys ruined the same document in Korean Wikipedia by Original Research(WP:NOR) under the belief of some doctrine that FC Seoul was compelled from Seoul and they fairly returned to Seoul. I think no matter what happened, they deceited the people in Anyang and that's why FC Seoul is the most hatred team in the league. Therefore it doesn't matter for me whether they 'forced out' or not - it matters that you guys are making Original Research and spreading your theaories over the web.

Nevertheless, let's get back to the point. No matter what you think, the first reference you cited indicates that LG, Yukong and Ilhwa have been part of the committee since back in 1994. The committee decided to move the teams out of the city.

Your 1st ref(Ref No.10 of this doc) have you read the other part of the article? ‘’The 3 clubs including Ilhwa, who didn’t set their city home, will set up their base city by the end of this year. Ilhwa is regarding Seongnam, Yukong is regarding Bucheon and LG is regarding Seoul or Suwon to set their base city 아직 도시연고를 확정하지 않은 일화등 3개구단은 올해안에 연고도시를 선정할 계획이다. 일화는 성남, 유공은 부천, LG는 서울 또는 수원을 연고도시로 검토하고 있다’’ – which means ‘they are regarding’ to set up a home in some other cities than Seoul. It’s not forced.

Your 2nd ref(Ref No.11 of this doc), is written in December 1995. About a year later since the decision is made. The Blue house is forced them to follow the agreement.

Your rest refs(Ref No.12-15 of this doc) are just saying these 3 clubs are Seoul clubs beforehand. I know.

You need to proof below

1. ‘’K League announced that We are planing to pass this policy by the majority vote.’’ Citations?

This is Rreferences in Februay 1996. Before the meeting.<ref>프로축구 지역연고제</ ref>

2. ‘’I'd like to give a question to everyone.’’ Could I regard it as you don’t have the proof or proper citations but people’s guess to support your theory, correct?

Kingkenny1967 (talk) 10:53, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Your opionion is Original Research([[WP:NOR] Please present reliable sources including comprehensive conclusion sentences

The K League also established decentralization, which forced all three clubs in Seoul to move to other cities. https://books.google.co.kr/books?id=9gYjBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA64&lpg=PA64&dq=Decentralization+policy+in+K+League&source=bl&ots=-kxcsNMN84&sig=goZvvBmgcO0RZUuXDI3JIm1QmCk&hl=ko&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwioo4yi0avSAhVBkpQKHUdxBzoQ6AEIMzAE#v=onepage&q=Decentralization%20policy%20in%20K%20League&f=false

Reply to Kingkenny Your conclusion was Wikipedia:No original research and your articles are meaningess and not suitible references about this discussion. Your reference also announced that K League committee move out 3 clubs to another cities. K Leauge committee include Yokong, Ilhwa, LG. But This does not mean that 3 clubs agree to relocate from Seoul. Because the relocation discision can pass with the majority vote. Before meeting of K League representatives in Februay 1995, K League Front Office chief announced that We are planing to pass this policy by the majority vote. Because 3 clubs still want to stay Seoul and we can't wait more <ref>지역연고지 매듭짓겠다</ ref>

According to your reference 1. K Leageu Commitee had 10 delegate. 3 clubs delegate want to stay Seoul vs Other 7 delegate want 3 clubs to move out Seoul. In your reference 3 about result of meeting of representatives in Februay 1995, There isn't the sentences that 3 clubs exaclty agree to relocation decision. Just This article announced that relocation decision was passed.

Do you really think that Decision was passed = 3 clubs agree? This is Wikipedia:No original research

From July 1994, K League Front office carrid forward a 3 clus relocation plan. In your reference 2, November 1994, Considering to move out of 3 clubs! What does it matter? This was just preparing for K League relocation plan.

December 1994, There was meeting of representatives. Beforre the this meating, K League announced that we will pass the dicision and We will forcibly assign new franchise of 3 clubs. But In this meeting, 3 clubs still opposed all the way. Decision was not passed. <ref>프로축구 지역연고제</ ref>

Therefore, Februay 1995, Again, Meeting of representatives was held in order to pass the relocaion decision. And to conclude, In December 1994, 3 clubs definatley still want to stay Seoul. In November 1994, 3 club's Considering to move out don't have any meaning.

Do you really think that Only Considering in 1994 November = 3 Clubs Voluntary Relocation? This is Wikipedia:No original research

Finally, Don't present each articles during 1994-1995. Your articles don't have comprehensive evaluation.

Please present newspaper articles like my reference. From 2009 ~ 2014, In many recent press which gave major coverage about this policy, It has reported that this policy was compulsory. You never present newspaper articles like my referene. You present Each articles during 1994-1995, You're opinion is your Wikipedia:No original research.

In many recent press which gave major coverage about this policy, I can't find your opinion which 3 clubs relocatied volutarily

I have something to tell English wikipedia users. Kingkenny opionion was exploded in Korean wikipedia discussion. [4]

(1) Korean Sports News Pape: Sports Seoul said 한국프로축구연맹의 3개팀의 연고이전을 강행했다. 강행 means 강제(强制)로 시행(行)하다 = compulsory enforcement. http://www.fntoday.co.kr/bbs/list.html?table=bbs_219&idxno=94642&page=192&total=3877&sc_area=&sc_word=

(2) The Sports Business in The Pacific Rim: Economics and Policy said - K League also established decentralization, which forced all three clubs in Seoul to move to other cities. https://books.google.co.kr/books?id=9gYjBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA64&lpg=PA64&dq=Decentralization+policy+in+K+League&source=bl&ots=-kxcsNMN84&sig=goZvvBmgcO0RZUuXDI3JIm1QmCk&hl=ko&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwioo4yi0avSAhVBkpQKHUdxBzoQ6AEIMzAE#v=onepage&q=Decentralization%20policy%20in%20K%20League&f=false

(3) 축구와 야구의 차이, 그리고 연고의식 이 과정에서 프로축구연맹은 서울의 공동화를 위해 당시 서울에 있던 세 팀 LG, 유공, 일화를 강제연고이전시켰다.

(4) 서울 연고 이랜드프로축구단 출범…FC서울과 '투톱' 1996년 정부의 강압적인 ‘서울 연고 공동화(空洞化) 정책’으로 한때 프로축구 불모지로 전락했던 수도 서울이 다시 축구의 중심지로 거듭날지 주목된다.

Footwiks (talk)

Comment: I don't understand.

Your theory 1: ‘’’1. K Leageu Commitee had 10 delegate. 3 clubs delegate want to stay Seoul vs Other 7 delegate want 3 clubs to move out Seoul.’’’ Where is the reference?

Your theory 2: For the ‘’’일화.유공.LG도 서울을 탈피,수도권 도시를 새 연고지로 변경을 검토하고 있다.’’’ part – If you can read and understand Korean, it means Ilhwa, Yukong and LG are the subject of the sentence.

Your theory 3: So you are saying ‘3 clubs considering to move out from Seoul’ means nothing but your reference means something true? Why mines are not? The references I used are complying with reliable source standard.

Compulsory Enforcement : Yes, of course. Because these 3 clubs didn’t follow the agreement they made as a part of K League Committee.

Kingkenny1967 (talk) 11:21, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Comment:

Your theory 1: I also ask? Where is the reference? 3 clubs agree to relocate in meeting of Februay 1995

Your theory 2: Your reference In Novemver 1994. Considering is not meaning. December 1994, 3 clubs denied to relocate.

Your theory 3: Your refrence are each newspaper artice during 1994 July ~1995 Feburay. Main event happend after Februay in 1995, For example Blue House relocaion order

Please put your signature here

Mate, put some signature once you comment - and don't move/delete my signature. So you made all of your points, right? Now it's time to sign up. Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Decentralization policy in K League

Kingkenny1967 (talk) 11:21, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

We have to evaluate this policy overally. After overall evaluation, Recent press announced that this policy was compulsory. Present the recent references with overall conclusion like belows. Now your reference are meaningless and your opinion is Wikipedia:No original research

(1) Korean Sports News Pape: Sports Seoul said 한국프로축구연맹의 3개팀의 연고이전을 강행했다. 강행 means 강제(强制)로 시행(行)하다 = compulsory enforcement. http://www.fntoday.co.kr/bbs/list.html?table=bbs_219&idxno=94642&page=192&total=3877&sc_area=&sc_word=

(2) Korean Sports News Pape: Sports Seoul said 한국프로축구연맹의 3개팀의 연고이전을 강행했다. 강행 means 강제(强制)로 시행(行)하다 = compulsory enforcement. http://www.fntoday.co.kr/bbs/list.html?table=bbs_219&idxno=94642&page=192&total=3877&sc_area=&sc_word=

(3) 축구와 야구의 차이, 그리고 연고의식 축구와 야구의 차이, 그리고 연고의식 이 과정에서 프로축구연맹은 서울의 공동화를 위해 당시 서울에 있던 세 팀 LG, 유공, 일화를 강제연고이전시켰다.

(4) 서울 연고 이랜드프로축구단 출범…FC서울과 '투톱' 서울 연고 이랜드프로축구단 출범…FC서울과 '투톱' 1996년 정부의 강압적인 ‘서울 연고 공동화(空洞化) 정책’으로 한때 프로축구 불모지로 전락했던 수도 서울이 다시 축구의 중심지로 거듭날지 주목된다 Footwiks (talk) 15:38, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

References

Policy attribute - Compulsory v Voluntary: Arrangement

I made a mediation request for your guys. Please sign up in the following link. Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Decentralization policy in K League Kingkenny1967 (talk) 11:10, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Comment Primary issues by Kingkenny: Should the document describe the policy was compulsory/forced without the agreement from the 3 clubs?, or the agreement was made and the implementation was forced?

Firstly, Let's set Primary issues and arrange final opinion.

Do you change your opinion? You insisted that 3 clubs agreed implementation of relocation decision. Therefore, This policy's attribute was voluntary overally.
Your Requriement: Totally remove word - compulosy, forced, compell in this article.

What is your current exact point and what do you want? I don't understand primary issues that you stated in the Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Decentralization policy in K League Now, Do you insist that this policy is partly compulsory? Let me know your exact point of opinion~

논점이 예전이랑 바뀌신 것 같은데 정확하게 주장하고 싶으신게 무었인지 한국어로도 기술해 주시기 바랍니다. 그리고 저는 위에 논쟁때부터 3구단이 동의 안 했다고 한 적 없어요. 서울 연고 공동화 정책에서 1996년 1월에 최종적으로 어찌됐든 3 구단이 공동화 실행에 동의했으니까 안양LG, 천안일화, 부천SK가 생긴것이고 이것은 팩트죠. 동의 안 했으면 계속 서울 3구단으로 남거나 아니면 해체해서 없어지거나 그래야죠. 그런데 저는 연맹이 주도한 공동화 실행에 3구단의 동의란것이 중요한 의미가 없다는 생각입니다. 왜냐면 동의 이전 1995년에 분명히 반대 의사를 계속 밝혔고 청와대 강제 지시, 연맹에서 리그 탈퇴 이런 강압이 있었으니 어쩔 수 없이 굴복한 것으로 명목상 합의일뿐라고 생각합니다.(총칼로 위협한 것도 아닌데 뭐가 강압이냐 이러면 저로써도 드릴 말씀 없고).... 계속 예를 들지만 종군위안부, 강제징용 이런것도 결국 어찌되었든 동의해서 계약서도 있고 댓가로 월급도 받았는데 결국 동의했으니 킹케니님 논리면 자발적으로 한게 되는건가요? 그러면 세상에 강제라고 그러면 붙일 수 있는게 뭐가 있을까요? 아무리 위협해도 이겨내거나 아니면 저항하다가 죽던가 해서 끝나거 버려야지....아무리 강압이 있어도 동의 하면 최종적으로 자기가 동의해서 한 것이니 자발적으로 한 것이 되어 버리는데....

결국 이 정책의 실질과 종합적으로 평가한다면 정책의 전체 속성은 당연히 강제성이 맞는것이고 반면에 당연히 어찌됐든 동의해서 나갔으니 서울 연고 공동화 정책은 자발적으로 3 구단이 나간것이다 이 논리가 말이 안 된다는 것입니다. 참고삼아 얘기드리자면 리그베다 위키에서도 자발성 VS 강제성 논리로 토론 벌어졌고 지금 킹케니님 의견과 비슷한 논리로 자발성이 맞다고 진행했지만 결국 강제성으로 총의가 모아졌습니다.

Fookwiks Arrangement

(1) Background In order to understand this policy and dispute of discussion, I arranged background knowledge about South Korean Professional Football at that time. There were 3 football clubs in Seoul - Ilhwa (1989-1995, LG (1990-1995), Yukong (1991-1995). As you know, Operation of Professional Sports League and Clubs is business to gain profit. Therefore Big Market Franchise is very important. To choose or relocate of franchise is club's right. Generally, Professional club's Relocations are done by club's free will and reasons are for club's interest.

Seoul is the capital and biggest city in South Korea. Population is ten million. Especially, In 1990s, Football facilities were very poor in South Korea. There are stadiums with night facilites in Only 5-6 Major cities including Seoul, Busan, Daegu and so on. (For reference, 3 clubs were relocated in 1996, Ilhwa used Oryong Stadium which had no night facilities in new franchsie - Cheonan by 2000. Yukong decided the new franchise - Bucheon. But There isn't stadium. Therefore Yukong stayed in Seoul by 2000, LG also decided the new franchise - Anyang. But There isn't night facility, Therefore LG stayed in Seoul by 1996)

Commonsensically, 3 clubs don' have any reasons to leave Seoul Voluntarily. If so, Why did 3 clubs relocate from Seoul to other small cities?

At that time, South Korea was bidding for 2002 FIFA World Cup and competed for Japan. Japan's J League was very popular during 1993~1994. On the other hand, K League was not popular. South Korea Goverment judged that low K League popularity is weak point of attracting 2002 FIFA World Cup (For reference, 2002 FIFA Word Cup bidding Decision Day was June 1, 1996) Korea Football Association made a discision to imitate the J League System including Franchise System to improve K League's Popularity.축구와 야구의 차이, 그리고 연고의식 (For reference, In 1993~1995, J League didn't have Capital City - Toyko Clubs.)

In summary, For Success of attracting the 2002 World Cup, KFA and South Korea Government and South Korean Press belived that 3 clubs's relocation they demand sacrifice of 3 clubs. Even, KFA and South Korea Government didn't have plan to compensate 3 clubs forgive of Seoul franchise. 3 Clubs were under increasing pressure to relocate.

(2) Let me check the fact: From July 1994 ~ February 1995

According to the newspaper articles at that time, There are references in upper paragraph, If you need, I'll attach

• From July 1994, K League committee launched and announced that we carried forward a relocation plan of 3 clubs in based Seoul.
• After this announce, 3 clubs serching for new candidate franchise for preparation of compulsory relocation.
• In December 1994, K League Committee Meeting, K League will forcibly assign new franchise of 3 clubs. But In this meeting, 3 clubs still opposed all the way. Therefore, Relocation decision was not passed and postponed the decision next meeting
• In Februay 1995, K League Committee Meeting, Relocation decision was just passed. We can't confirm that 3 clubs agree or disagree actually. Because Newspaper article don't have sufficint information. (ex: unanimity, 3 club's oppositions and so on were not mentioned.
  

Before this meeting, K League announced, If 3 clubs still oppose and can't come to an agreement with 3 clubs smoothly, K League will make a decision by majority vote and K League can pass relocation decision by majority vote.
Because K League Committee had 10 representatives. Representatives of 3 Clubs: stay vote vs 7 representatives: move out vote

In conclusion, Kingkenny's Opinion - Meeting in Februay 1995, 3 clubs agreed the relocation desision is Wikipedia:No original research. Also Opinion - Meeting in Februay 1995, 3 clubs didn't agree is Wikipedia:No original research
But In my personal opinion, Seoul is capital of South Korea and best big market in South Korea. Including 3 clubs, All Professional Sports clubs want Seoul Franchise.
Commonsensically, Possiblity of disagree is more than agree

Finaly, Only fact is Relocation decision was just passed in Meeting at February 1995

1995 ~ April 1996

• In October 1995, Yukong warned K League that they will dissolve the club if we actually relocated from seoul to other cities by decision.
  
• In November 1995, South Korean President Blue House issued relocation order. Because 3 clubs objected the relocation and South Korean Football can't solve the relocation problem internally.
  
• In November 1995, K League also announced that if the clubs don't accept the decision, they will be excluded from the K League.
  
• In December 1995, Still 3 clubs didn't agree on implementaion of decision
  
• In January 1996, 3 clubs agreed on implemention of relocation decision. then many city governments hoped to attract these clubs.
  

(3) The point in dispute Kingkenny insisted that 3 clubs relocated from Seoul to other cities voluntarily. Because they agreed on implemention of relocation decision. But In my opinion, In the context of this policy. Agree on implemention of relocation decision is not important part. Because this agree was made under pressure of K League and South Korea.

In the recent newspapers articles about this policy, I can't find the newspaper article which focus on agreement and voluntariness of 3 clubs about this policy Also Kingkenny didn't present the newspaper article which focus on agreement and voluntariness of 3 clubs about this policy in the recent newspapers articles about this policy, Only Kingkenny presented the newspaper articles which 3 clubs agreed during 1994~1996.

A: A club really don't want to relocate. But Agreement of relocation was made under pressure B: A club really want to do relocate. Agreement of relocation was made by freewill.

Both club made agreement of relocation. But Do you think that this is same case?

Figuratively speaking, Someone was sacked by forcibly at the company, After resignation order from company, He really want to work at the company in succession. But Anyway He signed and agree the resignation paper, Using Kingkenny logic. Someone signed resignation paper. Finally, He resigned voluntarily. Do you think that this logic is natural?

Another case, Comfort Women's action had also nominal agreement, Besides Comport Women received salary. Using Kingkenny logic, Their actions are not compulsory, Are their actions voluntary? So Don't we use word force, compell in the Comfort Women article?

Yes, At last, 3 clubs agreed on implementaion of relocation decision in January 1996 unavoidably, But Before they agree, They definatley want to stay Seoul constantly. Even if, South Korean President relocation order and K League's warining - They will be excluded from the K League.

We have to judge by subtantianl attriute not by nominal attriubtte and evaluate this policy overally. After comprehensive assessment, This policy's attribute is definatley compulsory no voluntary.

Most importantly, From 2009 ~ 2014, In many recent reliable press which gave major coverage about this policy, It has reported briefly and clearly that this policy was compulsory

But Kingkenny's all sources don't have the conclusion sentences that this policy was voluntary briefly and clearly. Especially, He don't have recent sources. We have to understand kingkenny's inference from each articles during 1994~1995. This is close to Wikipedia:No original research.

Please Go to the South korean version, ko:서울 연고 공동화 정책. This article is vast. There are a lot of references. After creation of article, Always, South korean version stated that This policy was compulsory policy. Surely, By discussion and with relaible sources, Absolutely, Consensus came to compulsory policy.

We have to rely on summarized conclusion sentences from reliable sources which include key point and policy's overall attribute briefly and clearly We need not to infer from each articles. According to the Wikipedia Rules: We can describe the sentences based on Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources

My Final Opinion: Agree on implementaion of relocaion decision was nominal. Because 3 clubs wanted to stay and resisted the decision By December 1995. .But South Korean President - Blue House and K League forced to accept implementaion of relocaion decision. The 3 clubs were forced to surrender. Therefore. This policy's attribute was compulsory overally. Of course, In the prosess, I also acknowledge that there was agreement. Though agreement was nominal.

My Requriement: We have to use word - compulosy, forced, compell in this article. in order to forward the fact of this policy. To use these words is not violation of neutrality.

Why does this policy have compulsory attribute not voluntary?

Sorry for my poor English. I hope that Native English users understand my point of opinion.

Summarized conclusion sentences which represented compulsary attribule of policy from reliable sources
(1) The Sports Business Book written in English (2014): The Sports Business in The Pacific Rim: Economics and Policy
K League also established decentralization, which forced all three clubs in Seoul to move to other cities.

(2) Korean Sports Newspaper: Sports Seoul reported (2009): 서울 더비를 보고 싶다
Translation: K League Front Office did compulsory enforcement of 3 club relocation.
한국프로축구연맹의 3개팀의 연고이전을 강행했다.

(3)' Korean Sports Newspaper: XSPORTS reported (2009): 축구와 야구의 차이, 그리고 연고의식
Translation: K League Front Office did reloctaion compulsorily in order to decentralizate
이 과정에서 프로축구연맹은 서울의 공동화를 위해 당시 서울에 있던 세 팀 LG, 유공, 일화를 강제연고이전시켰다.

(4) Korean Newspaper: Korea Economic Daily reported (2014): 서울 연고 이랜드프로축구단 출범…FC서울과 '투톱'
Translation: By South Korean Govenrment's Compulsory Decentralization policy. Seoul became football wasteland
1996년 정부의 강압적인 ‘서울 연고 공동화(空洞化) 정책’으로 한때 프로축구 불모지로 전락했던 수도 서울이 다시 축구의 중심지로 거듭날지 주목된다.
Translation: South Korean Govenment relocated 3 clubs compulsively.
하지만 정부가 2002년 월드컵 유치 활동과 맞물려 지방 축구 활성화를 내세우며 3개 프로축구단의 연고지를 강제로 다른 지역으로 이전시켰다.

--Footwiks (talk) 10:43, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Kingkenny1967 Arrangement

@Footwiks:First of all, please 'agree' to put it to mediation. Put 'agree' under Parties' agreement to mediation in Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Decentralization policy in K League.

You don't understand. My argument is, the agreement is made with these 3 clubs to move out from Seoul. But they didn't do it well and said the other word publicly. There were turmoils and Korean government issue a guideline to K League about to the move, but nobody know what the guideline it was. To the Wikipedia document, you can't write a description of something you don't know.

Here I made the citations in a chronical order for us all. Including your citations.

30 Jul 1994 Yonhap News http://sports.news.naver.com/general/news/read.nhn?oid=001&aid=0003780980

프로축구연맹은 프로리그 7개구단 단장 등 10명을 대의원으로 행정과 재정,기획,홍보 등을 축구협회와 별도로 총괄하게 된다.

"K League branched out from Korean Football Association, K League Committee is consisted of 10 people, including 7 Chief Excutives of K League clubs."

프로축구는 정부의 지원계획에 따라 국내 프로팀을 현재 7개에서 10개팀으로 늘릴 계획을 발표해 놓고 있어 기대되고 있다.

"As K League committee lauched, K League is planning to expand its league from the current 7 clubs to 10 clubs in line with Korean Government's support plan."

연맹은 또 일본프로축구(J리그)를 5년안에 추월한다는 목표아래 연고지의 재조정, 전용구장 확보에 중점을 둬 사업을 펼쳐나갈 방침이다.

"Also they are planning to operate focusing on re-allocation of base cities(of the participants), on securing soccer-specific stadiums under the target - to get better performance than J.League within 5 years."

일화,유공,LG가 동대문과 목동구장에 몰려있는 등 지역적 불균형을 해소하기위해 각 시,도로 분산시키고 공설운동장을 임대, 전용구장으로 활용하는 문제를 적극 추진할 계획이다.

"They are planning to disperse Ilhwa, Yukong and LG to solve the regional disparity, and renting public stadiums and securing them as soccer-specific stadiums.

25 October 1994 Yonhap News http://sports.news.naver.com/general/news/read.nhn?oid=001&aid=0003821571

서울지역에 연고를 둔 일화 유공 LG도 수도권으로 연고구장을 옮기려는 움직임을 보이고 있어 귀추가 주목 된다.

"Ilhwa, Yukong and LG who are based on Seoul, are showing interests to move to satelite cities, there is much attention towards the development of their move."

16 Nov 1994 Yonhap News http://sports.news.naver.com/general/news/read.nhn?oid=001&aid=0003882044

일화.유공.LG도 서울을 탈피,수도권 도시를 새 연고지로 변경을 검토하고 있다.

"Ilhwa, Yukong and LG are also regarding to move out from Seoul and to settle into satelite cities of Seoul."

16 Dec 1994 Kyonghyang Sinmun http://newslibrary.naver.com/viewer/index.nhn?articleId=1994121600329119001&edtNo=20&printCount=1&publishDate=1994-12-16&officeId=00032&pageNo=19&printNo=15285&publishType=00010

아직 도시연고를 확정하지 않은 일화등 3개구단은 올해안에 연고도시를 선정할 계획이다. 일화는 성남, 유공은 부천, LG는 서울또는 수원을 연고도시로 검토하고 있다.

"Including Ilhwa, the 3 clubs who didn't confirm their home city are planning to set up the home city within this year. Ilhwa is regarding Seongnam, Yukong is for Bucheon, LG is regarding Seoul or Suwon as their home city."

한국프로축구연맹은 그러나 이들 3개구단이 연고도시를 선택하지 못할 경우 오는 20일 열리는 이사회에서 강제로 연고도시를 배정키로해 구단의 의사와 관계없이 내년시즌 8구단의 페넌트레이스는 도시대항의 경쟁장으로 변모될 것이 확실시 되고 있다.

"K League, however, if these 3 clubs can't select the home city soon, they are planning to forcibly assign home cities to the clubs. Therefore, no matter what these clubs want, it seems certain that the pennant race of 8 clubs will be transformed as the competition among cities."

13 Feb 1995 K League 30th Annivesary. Seoul, South Korea: K League. 2013. p. 178. ISBN 9788996317845 http://i66.tinypic.com/30jnzb4.jpg

"13 Feb 1995, K League Committee decided to make Seoul as joint area of clubs since 1 Jan 1996. Making 3 Clubs based in Seoul(Yukong, LG, Ilhwa) to move out. They will be given the priority to move to Seoul, if they want to build a new soccer-specific stadium in Seoul after moving to other places. Once 3 clubs agreed with the decision, there were provincial offices who tried to attract these 3 clubs."

13 Feb 1995 Yonhap News http://sports.news.naver.com/general/news/read.nhn?oid=001&aid=0003906901

프로연맹은 현재 3개구단이 공동으로 소유하는 서울 연고권이 지역연고제 정착에 문제점이라는데 의견을 같이하고 내년 1월1일자로 서울을 8개구단공동지역으로 두고 3개구단의 연고를 타지역으로 옮기기로했다.

"K League Committee agreed that the current situation - 3 clubs in Seoul - is the problem to settle Regional-base policy and decided to set Seoul as the joint area of 8 clubs and let 3 clubs move out of Seoul from 1 Jan next year"

이사회는 그러나 지방으로 이전한 3개구단이 서울에 전용구장을 건립, 복귀를 추진할 경우 우선권을 주기로 하는 한편 올내로 서울 전용구장 건립계획을 수립하는 구단에 대해서는 서울 잔류를 허용하기로 했다.

"The committee, however, will give the priorities to the 3 Seoul clubs to return to Seoul if they build a soccer-specific stadium in Seoul. In the meantime, by the end of this year, if any of them projects a plan to build a soccer specific stadium in Seoul, they can stay in Seoul."

6 Nov 1995 Sports Seoul http://ikfhs.tistory.com/entry/%EC%84%9C%EC%9A%B8%EC%97%B0%EA%B3%A0%EA%B3%B5%EB%8F%99%ED%99%94%EC%A0%95%EC%B1%85

프로축구연맹은 최근 청와대로부터 서울 3팀의 연고지이전지침을 직접 하달받고 각 해당구단에 이같은 청와대의 의지를 전달한 것으로 알려졌다.

"It is known that K League have been directly given the guideline of moving the 3 teams in Seoul from Blue House and they delivered the determination of the Blue House to these clubs."

일화, 유공, LG 등 서울 3팀은 지난 2월 프로축구연맹 1차 이사회의 결정에 따라 모두 서울을 떠나기로 합의해 놓고도 아직까지 뚜렷한 이전계획을 내놓지 않았을 뿐더러 심지어 일부 구단은 최근 다시 서울에 눌러앉겠다는 입장을 공공연히 되풀이해 주위의 눈총을 받아왔다.

"These 3 teams in Seoul - Ilhwa, Yukong and LG are all agreed to move out from Seoul as per the decision from K League committee's 1st meeting in Feb this year, but still they didn't project any certain transfer plan. Even some of them have been eyesores as they publicly reverted to their stance to stay in Seoul."

9 Nov 1995 The Hankyoreh http://newslibrary.naver.com/viewer/index.nhn?articleId=1995110900289118017&editNo=5&printCount=1&publishDate=1995-11-09&officeId=00028&pageNo=18&printNo=2392&publishType=00010

연맹은 지난 2월 이사회에서 지역연고제 정착을 위한 고육지책으로 '전용구장을 확보하지 못할 경우 서울연고팀은 내년 시즌부터 무조건 서울을 비워야 한다'고 결의했으나, 서울 연고팀들의 탈서울 거부 움직임으로 성사 여부가 불투명해진 것이다

"In February, K League Committee resolved to Seoul teams need to move out from Seoul if they can't secure soccer-specific stadium, but it's not clear whether the resolution will be accomplished or not as the clubs in Seoul are showing rejection to the resolution."

유공은 다음 시즌부터 목동운동장을 홈구장으로 사용할 방침을 세우고 서울 잔류의사를 굽히지 않고 있으며, 일화쪽은 내년에도 동대문을 홈구장으로 계속 사용할 계획으로 연고지 이전을 거부하고 있는 것으로 알려졌다.

"Yukong is planning to use Mokdong stadium as home stadium from the next season and stood firm to stay in Seoul, on the Ilhwa side they refuse to move out from Seoul with a plan to continuously use Dongdaemun Stadium as their home next year."

LG도 "두 팀이 서울을 떠나지 않는다는 태도를 보이고 있는 마당에 우리만 떠날 수 없다"며 서울 연고를 고수할 뜻을 숨기지 않고 있다. 연맹은 이에 따라 지난 7일 서울연고 구단들이 연말까지 서울을 떠나지 않을 경우 내년 시즌 프로리그에 참여시키지 않는다는 내부방침을 세우고 각 구단에 서울이전 계획서 제출을 요구하는 공문을 발송했다.

"LG joined them, saying 'As two other(Seoul) teams declared to stay in Seoul, we can not be the only one to leave'. So K League sent letters to ask for the plan of moving out from Seoul, with setting up a internal policy that if the clubs don't leave Seoul by the end of this year, they can't participate to K League next season."

13 Dec 1995 The Hankyoreh http://newslibrary.naver.com/viewer/index.nhn?articleId=1995121300289119009&edtNo=5&printCount=1&publishDate=1995-12-13&officeId=00028&pageNo=19&printNo=2423&publishType=00010

프로연맹에 따르면 LG는 안양, 일화는 성남·과천·평택, 유공은 인천 등과 연고문제를 협의하고 있으며 일부 구단은 이미 방안을 확정해 놓은 것으로 알려졌다.

그러나 3개 구단은 서울에 미련을 버리지 못하고 서로 발표를 미룬 채 상대 구단의 동태만 살피고 있다는 것이다.

"According to K League, LG is negotiating with Anyang, Ilhwa is with Seongnam, Gwacheon and Pyeongtaek, Yukong is with Incheon, and some of them already confirmed their choice. But these 3 clubs can't let it go, keep watching on each other and defer the announcement(of the new home)."

and they started to move from Jan 4 1996.

+ Adding to that, Seoul is 공동지역Joint Area so they have games in Seoul in 1996. http://newslibrary.naver.com/viewer/index.nhn?articleId=1996091200329116001&editNo=40&printCount=1&publishDate=1996-09-12&officeId=00032&pageNo=16&printNo=15880&publishType=00010

Kingkenny1967 (talk) 07:59, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Significant grammar issues throughout the article

Nearly the entire article is full of incorrect English grammar (and occasionally incorrect vocabulary as well). It seems that there has been significant disagreement in the past as to which terms should or shouldn't be in the article, so I don't want to just change vocabulary and grammar that may be relevant to that dispute. Since most of the sources used as citations are in Korean, we may need editors with a high degree of fluency in both English and Korean to fix the current issues on this article. I don't know whether we need to tag the article or go a different route to getting it fixed, but it definitely does need fixing. MojaveSummit (talk) 06:48, 10 February 2022 (UTC)