Talk:KVTK (rocket stage)

Russia: Technology & engineering Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the technology and engineering in Russia task force.

Spaceflight Low‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge with Angara (rocket family)

I believe that this article is not helpful on its own and should be merged. I will wait for a few days to allow for any counter proposals. Jab843 (talk) 17:22, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My counter-proposal is that the KVTK is not only designed for the Angara Rocket but also for the Proton-K and Zenit rockets. KVTK is similar to the Block DM in the sense that it can be fitted into more than one type of rocket. The information is in the source on the article (Krunchinev) but I have not yet added it to the actual Wikipedia article, hence the mis-information that it is only to be used on the Angara. Scruce (talk) 12:44, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The Proton-K is no longer in service, so that is doubtful. --W. D. Graham 16:08, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think the subject matter is definitely notable and worthy of its own article, however in its current state it is too short too be useful, so I would say it either needs to be expanded, or merged for now and then split back out at a later date. --W. D. Graham 16:08, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]