A fact from KUSD (AM) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 August 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of radio stations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Radio StationsWikipedia:WikiProject Radio StationsTemplate:WikiProject Radio StationsRadio station articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Dakota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of South Dakota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South DakotaWikipedia:WikiProject South DakotaTemplate:WikiProject South DakotaSouth Dakota articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Overall: Earwig's Copyvio detector shows a match of 28.1%, but the site in question states "Text taken from Wikipedia". I prefer the original hook to ALT1, but both are OK. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 20:52, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Thomas H. White and Sammi Brie: Not sure if I'm just missing something obvious, but what in the body supports the lead's "At the time of its deletion, KUSD was the oldest broadcasting station in the state of South Dakota" and "it was the predecessor to the present radio service of South Dakota Public Broadcasting."? Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 12:09, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Sammi Brie:MOS:INTRO says that "Apart from basic facts, significant information should not appear in the lead if it is not covered in the remainder of the article." Ideally, I think the cited info from the lead should be repeated, with the citations, in the body, and then the citations taken out of the lead. But happy to discuss if you disagree. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 20:41, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]