Talk:KOOP (FM)

United States: Texas / Austin Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas - Austin (assessed as Low-importance).

Radio Stations Low‑importance

	Radio portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of radio stations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Radio StationsWikipedia:WikiProject Radio StationsTemplate:WikiProject Radio StationsRadio station articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fires

An editor removed the section on the fires today with the edit summary "Editorial source unreliable and potentially slanderous." Given that the allegation that the fires were intentionally set came from the major Austin newspaper - in a news story and attributed to the fire department - I don't see the editorial concerns mentioned. —C.Fred (talk) 21:33, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, C.Fred. You were seconds ahead of me. See below (I'll remove the extra header). Allreet (talk) 21:45, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The removal of the section on KOOP's fires on the grounds stated is, in my opinion, unjustified. Essentially, this strikes me as a suppression of information that is in the interest of readers to know about. I'm usually a suppressor of "juicy tidbits" and other un-encyclopedic entries, mostly for the reasons stated, that is, poor sources and when the material relates to living persons, because of the possibility of libel. That is not the case here. Sources on this story are as abundant as they get, so the facts seem clear. Meanwhile, no party other than the station is mentioned by name. I would suggest replacing one or two of the citations on the basis of notability (that is, other more notable sources are available), but the editor in question has to know that. Removing the material on this basis doesn't come close to qualifying, even under the most narrow reading of WP's guidelines. Given that, I'm reverting the removal. Allreet (talk) 21:42, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted the KOOP article to the previous version by C. Fred on the grounds that an editor (Aleccawthorne123) is trying to suppress a sourced story on specious grounds. I plan to add to the sources, but at this point every word in this section is accurate. I also plan to notify Aleccawthorne123 and respectfully request that no further changes be made to this section to avoid a 3-revert WP:EDIT WAR. By the way, the story as it stands is supported in reports by the Austin Chronicle, News 8, WVUE-TV, MSNBC and FoxNews (both Associated Press stories), Austin Business Journal and, among other sources, Current national public broadcast magazine. Allreet (talk) 00:01, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at your diff, it was pretty clear that the news sources (Statesman and News 8) were two of the things he'd removed. I agree with restoring them. I'm not sure what exactly Aleccawthorne123's motives are or who he is—as opposed to Koopfm917 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), who blanked the page today, who I blocked as a suspected sockpuppet of Joeyv1000 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). In that case, I felt the link was pretty clear. —C.Fred (talk) 01:05, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on KOOP (FM). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:04, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]