Talk:KMET (FM)

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Radio Stations

	Radio portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of radio stations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Radio StationsWikipedia:WikiProject Radio StationsTemplate:WikiProject Radio StationsRadio station articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Tone

This article is in some need of an overall adjustment in tone and air personality and program director listing. For example: Mikel Hunter joined KMET-FM as Operations and Program Director in late 1972, ending his stint late in 1974. (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Captain_Mikey#KMET_.281972.E2.80.931974.29) [[Goodhelp (talk) 23:40, 29 May 2015 (UTC)]][reply]

While content was created by one or more avid listeners, the adulation flirts with violation of NPoV standards in passages like:

"To its fans throughout the 1970s and mid-1980s, KMET's progressive rock radio format was what you listened to in Los Angeles if you were to be considered 'hip.'"

While such sentiments may have been found in some listeners, I doubt many of the people who listened to KROQ, KRLA, KIQQ or even KEZY could be said to feel the same way.

Harrison's Mike might be worth a mention as well (Sundays 10 PM to midnight as I recall).

Sangrito 19:32, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I revised much of the history here to give this article a bit of polish. For reference, I gathered up info from the web, and used Jim Ladd’s book to fill in some detail (though exact dates and facts are a little suspect here). Seems the history of the station depends on who’s telling it. The truth lies somewhere in the middle of it all, I suspect.

I hope the revision here meets with everyone’s approval. Much of the current article is terrible. It looks like a BMR puff piece (no offense intended here, of course). This paragraph, in particular, is ridiculous:

KMET has stood alone in pioneering the free-form style of rock radio. Everything from folk to acid rock to rockabilly to modern jazz to pop to R&B might be heard in one well blended set. The sudden death by heart attack of the unofficial dean of KMET B. Mitchel Reed (in 1983 after he had moved to KLOS-FM) and (likely) the event of a cocaine epidemic in the entertainment industry were likely factors in KMET’s demise.

A former employee’s death? Cocaine epidemic? Nah, I think it was an unknown killer on the grassy knoll. I corrected this, as everyone knows that changing times, corporate meddling and consultants killed this station.

As I understand, KMET and KSAN, it’s sister station in San Francisco, picked up the rock format after the staff of KPPC and KMPX (San Francisco) walked out of the station and went on strike. This was in Ladd’s book, as well as on a few websites. Anyone have the whole story?

This isn't finished yet. I'm still doing more research. --Fightingirish 18:52, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:KMET upside down.jpg

Image:KMET upside down.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:36, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:KMET upside down.jpg

Image:KMET upside down.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:36, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Defunct vs. (YYYY-YYYY)

I'm not sure where the style guide discussion for naming media-entity pages is. I started to move one that I came across, but see there are a lot of them. "(defunct)" doesn't make sense historically. Eventually /all/ stations will be defunct. We want something like "KMET (1972-1986)" or "KMET (FM)" (since that is currently unambiguous). – SJ + 21:27, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Any disambiguating term should be, well, unambiguous. "Defunct" is ambiguous. It doesn't tell the reader what this was before it was defunct -- nor would "YYYY-YYYY".

Since there has only ever been, as far as I'm aware, one KMET-FM, that would be the best name for the article, and then no additional disambiguating term would be needed (yet). If another FM station with those call letters appears, then a disambiguating term can be considered for one or both.--NapoliRoma (talk) 00:06, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Last shift/song

This is definitely WP:OR, but my memory is that the last shift was Mike Harrison, and the last song he played was "Highway to Hell". This probably doesn't contradict the (uncited) mention of the last song being "The End", because I also recall that they went to un-DJed programming in the runup to "The Wave".--NapoliRoma (talk) 04:36, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on KMET (FM). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090720051838/http://www.sgvtribune.com/rds_search/ci_12660580?IADID=Search-www.sgvtribune.com-www.sgvtribune.com to http://www.sgvtribune.com/rds_search/ci_12660580?IADID=Search-www.sgvtribune.com-www.sgvtribune.com

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:50, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Whoo-ya, Whoo.a, or Hoo Ya

This is a bit of vague ancient history. My best recollection was on a Harrison's Mike segment from 1980-something, one of the on air talents (Ace Young?) used to do a lot of on-air vomiting sounds for added drama, and the "fragments of spittle would hit the mic." The "vomit onomatopoeia" became Whoo a or Whoo ya. A lot of web searching turned up very little on the origin. Although somewhere there may be an interview clip that goes into the history. Group29 (talk) 13:29, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merging this would make sense

KMET did not "sign off" in 1987. It changed call letters to KTWV and is still on the air under those call letters.

To have a separate listing for a "defunct" station that is not actually so violates Wikipedia policy, and I suggest that the content on this page be merged into the existing page on KTWV. Kymber1956 (talk) 16:10, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]