Talk:KCMP

Minnesota Mid‑importance

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Radio Stations Mid‑importance

	Radio portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of radio stations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Radio StationsWikipedia:WikiProject Radio StationsTemplate:WikiProject Radio StationsRadio station articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

I think this article might qualify for Good Article criteria. I haven't done much to edit the article, so I'm not sure I should be the one to submit it, but I might submit it anyway. --Elkman - (Elkspeak) 17:22, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

an article from time of stations beginning

Found this link to an article on the station around the time of its first airing. http://www.pulsetc.com/article117d.html?op=Print&sid=1606

also this 10th anniversary city pages write up about the founding of the station: http://www.citypages.com/2014-01-22/music/89-3-the-current-an-oral-history/full/

Wowaconia (talk) 22:44, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality and other issues

Recently, several IP users have confirmed to the same edit (including the decade that another station was on), as well as adding a source that, while mentions KCMP, does not do so in the way it is claimed in the article. The sentence claiming that KCMP is based on other stations (WXPN-Philadelpha, KCRW-L.A. & Seattle's KEXP-FM) seems to be original research and not reflected in the article, which just lumps KCMP in with these other stations, but makes no mention of them influencing KCMP. Is this original research? Furthermore, the body of text claims these stations are pioneers of non-commercial alternative radio (presumably meaning the alternative rock format, as KPFA , for example, was doing non-commercial alternative (not alternative rock but alternative in general) radio in the 1940s and '50s. On another issue, I don't see the need of why the decade that "Rev105" operated is germain, but, in my opinion, just the word "former" works well (if people are curious which decade Rev105 was on, they can look at the link).Stereorock (talk) 03:55, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The addition of unrelated stations without a source that mentions KCMP is linkspam at worst and original research at best. Jonathunder (talk) 20:09, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on KCMP. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051124165650/http://minnewiki.publicradio.org/index.php/Minnewiki_Home to http://minnewiki.publicradio.org/index.php/Minnewiki_Home

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:45, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]