Talk:KBC Advanced Technologies

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Dubious edit - conflict of interest

User Kmbkctg has only ever made three edits - the edits to this article, all around the time the stock market press was first discussing takeover options. The name is an interleave of KBC and mktg. I can't help but wonder about the motivation and the veracity. -- Cain Mosni (talk||contribs) 13:40, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(cur | prev) 14:46, 23 January 2015‎ Kmbkctg (talk | contribs)‎ . . (4,060 bytes) (-8)‎ . . (undo | thank)
(cur | prev) 14:45, 23 January 2015‎ Kmbkctg (talk | contribs)‎ . . (4,068 bytes) (+595)‎ . . (undo | thank)
(cur | prev) 14:19, 23 January 2015‎ Kmbkctg (talk | contribs)‎ . . (3,473 bytes) (+460)‎ . . (Leadership and profit numbers) (undo | thank)

Contested deletion

I believe thus page should not be deleted because the company is well known in the industry. It is mentioned at a lot of places across the web. A search for the company phrase returns around 18,900 pages.

This page should not be speedy deleted because it is for a company widely known. It also has high presence on the internet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shahidilahabadi (talk • contribs) 18:35, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The number of results on Google isn't relevant, what matters is whether there is significant coverage from reliable sources - I looked on Google news and search, and there are references that could be added to the article, so I've removed the deletion notice. Peter E. James (talk) 19:07, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]