Talk:KAUG

	Radio portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of radio stations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Radio StationsWikipedia:WikiProject Radio StationsTemplate:WikiProject Radio StationsRadio station articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Alaska Low‑importance

	Alaska portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alaska, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Alaska on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AlaskaWikipedia:WikiProject AlaskaTemplate:WikiProject AlaskaAlaska articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rationale for deletion

Deletion of this page would aid in cleanup per the current standards of WP:DISAMBIG to remove unnecessary disambiguation pages and simplify both navigation and linking. - Dravecky (talk) 00:54, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As I noted on my talk page... To quote from the WP:DISAMB page referenced above, "If only a primary topic and one other topic require disambiguation, then disambiguation links are sufficient, and a disambiguation page is unnecessary." Since the radio station call letters are the primary identification and the code reference to an airport is a secondary identification, a hat note is sufficient and requires no more steps than would a disambiguation page for people seeking the airport. - Dravecky (talk) 04:02, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's not really important whether this article be deleted or turned into a redirect to the radio station. What is important is that if it does become a redirect, then a hatnote similar to this one is put on the target of the redirect pointing to the other use. The advantage of a redirect is that administrator action is not required. The side-effect is that the talk page is preserved. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 04:25, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since the only content of this talk page is this discussion, as argument for its own deletion, preserving it at the expense of ease of use and clarity would be bitterly ironic, at best. - Dravecky (talk) 04:38, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on KAUG. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100301134627/http://www.arbitron.com/ to http://www.arbitron.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:54, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]