Talk:K-60 (Kansas highway)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dough 48 72 02:18, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
Do not use "then" when describing progression of route in route description.
Removed instance of "then". — P C B 03:06, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Is a more exact establishment date for the road known?
I believe it is 1932 but I cannot verify this as I do not have a 1931 map. — P C B 03:00, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
An image of the road would be nice, but not required.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

I will place the article on hold for a couple concerns to be addressed. Dough 48 72 02:18, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will now pass the article. Dough 48 72 03:16, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]