Talk:K-44 (Kansas highway)

K-44 (Kansas highway) has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 1, 2014	Good article nominee	Listed

U.S. Roads: State highways / Kansas Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	U.S. state highways
Locations	Kansas
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:K-44 (Kansas highway)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: CycloneIsaac (talk · contribs) 20:37, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this.—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 20:37, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"In 2013, KDOT measured traffic counts in terms of average annual daily traffic (AADT) on K-44 ranging from a high of 729 vehicles in Anthony to a low of 313 vehicles in western Sumner County." Comma between "Anthony" and "to"?
I don't think so. Here's how I judge whether or not a comma is needed in these situations: if a comma would make sense without the prepositional phrases, then I add it. However, in this case without the prepositional phrases it would read "ranging from a high, to a low", which doesn't read right. T C N7JM 00:08, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good!—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 23:24, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replied. T C N7JM 00:08, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, there's nothing else significant, so I'm passing this article.—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 00:09, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]