Talk:K-239 (Kansas highway)

K-239 (Kansas highway) has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 10, 2022. (Reviewed version).

U.S. Roads: State highways / Kansas Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	U.S. state highways
Locations	Kansas
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Kansas Low‑importance

	Kansas portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kansas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Kansas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KansasWikipedia:WikiProject KansasTemplate:WikiProject KansasKansas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:K-239 (Kansas highway)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tayi Arajakate (talk · contribs) 01:41, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 420Traveler, I'll be taking up the review for this nomination as well and will present it to you shortly. I hope you find my feedback helpful. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 01:41, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Kansas City, Fort Scott, Miami and Tulsa Short should probably be wiki-linked in the lead and the transport department should be wiki-linked, the rest is in order.

Assessment

Comprehension: The comprehension is good.

Pass

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (prose)	The prose is clear and concise.	Pass
(b) (MoS)	The article is compliant with the manual of style.	Pass

Verifiability: The article is verifiable.

Pass

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (references)	The article has a list of references and in line citations for all material in the body.	Pass
(b) (citations to reliable sources)	Sources used are reliable	Pass
(c) (original research)	No original research found.	Pass
(d) (copyvio and plagiarism)	No copyright violation or plagiarism found.	Pass

Comprehensiveness: The article is comprehensive.

Pass

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (major aspects)	The article covers all major aspects.	Pass
(b) (focused)	No unnecessary deviations are present.	Pass

Neutrality: The article is neutral.

Pass

Notes	Result
The article is compliant with the policy on neutral point of view.	Pass

Stability: The article is stable.

Pass

Notes	Result
No ongoing edit warring or content disputes.	Pass

Illustration: The illustration is sufficient.

Pass

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales)	N/A	Pass
(b) (appropriate use with suitable captions)	Caption is suitable.	Pass