Talk:K-232 (Kansas highway)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: TCN7JM (talk · contribs) 00:11, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
I will review this article immediately. TCN7JM 00:11, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
I have the following concerns:
- You should modify the conversion template to read "17.263-mile-long" by having it read
{{convert|17.263|mi|km|adj=mid|-long}}
. - Try to cut down starting so many sentences in the lead with "K-232".
- Regarding the first sentence in the history, I don't think it's referred to that often as "Route K-232".
- Is it possible to reword the first sentence so that it reads "between Interstate 70 and what was then U.S. Route 40" or something? I think this would be better for flow, despite the current name of the road being "Old U.S. 40".
- I'd rather not, but if you insist I will. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 17:33, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
- It's okay as-is, I guess. TCN7JM 11:41, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
- I'd rather not, but if you insist I will. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 17:33, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
- Was the route paved when it was designated? If not, when?
- I can't find this information, but knowing Kansas it's highly likely that it was. I just don't think there will be any sources out there to say. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 17:33, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
- Looking at the first map that had K-232 on it is usually enough. I tried to check the map myself, but my browser won't open the file for some reason. TCN7JM 11:41, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
- I can't find this information, but knowing Kansas it's highly likely that it was. I just don't think there will be any sources out there to say. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 17:33, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
- "K-18/K-232 highway" doesn't sound common either.
- You start both paragraphs of the route description with "K-232" and that does look overused within those paragraphs. You should try to switch up the nouns a bit.
- You should use
{{convert/spell}}
for the single-digit mileages near the end of the second paragraph.
I will put this article on hold to fix these concerns. TCN7JM 00:49, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Alright, all of my concerns seem to have been addressed. I will pass this article. Good job. TCN7JM 12:29, 9 August 2013 (UTC)