Talk:K-146 (Kansas highway)

K-146 (Kansas highway) has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: September 26, 2013. (Reviewed version).

Kansas Low‑importance

	Kansas portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kansas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Kansas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KansasWikipedia:WikiProject KansasTemplate:WikiProject KansasKansas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Roads: State highways / Kansas Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	U.S. state highways
Locations	Kansas
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:K-146 (Kansas highway)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: CycloneIsaac (talk · contribs) 21:07, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing later. Are you sure you're done with the article?—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 21:07, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yup. Go ahead and start whenever you're ready. T C N7JM 21:24, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay then.

Does ref #6 have a title?
Ref #5 is dead.
Ref #2 is blank.

Those three are the only problems. —CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 21:34, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replies:

Added.
That was a traffic count map, but the same (possibly more specific) info was included in the PMIS data, so I used that instead.
Fixed.

I believe everything has been addressed. T C N7JM 21:47, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, passing.—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 22:10, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OR

@LilianaUwU: I can't find where it says "K-146 is not part of the National Highway System" in the source. The analysis being done appears to be that because it is not included we can conclude that it is not part of it... But that is clearly OR. Absence has never been evidence on wikipedia. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 17:42, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Primary source overuse

A primary source overuse tag was removed but every single source appears to be primary, can you explain your thinking on this one @LilianaUwU: or was this just collateral damage? Horse Eye's Back (talk) 17:45, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

She doesn't need to explain anything. Have a nice day. — MatthewAnderson707 (talk|sandbox) 02:10, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

She does not, but I can't think of a reason she wouldn't. Never met an editor who wasn't willing to explain their edits. How did you find this conversation? You don't appear to have ever edited the page or the talk. Are you present here as the result of an off-wiki discussion? Horse Eye's Back (talk) 06:24, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]