Talk:K-140 (Kansas highway)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: TCN7JM (talk · contribs) 22:18, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
I would love to review this article. –TCN7JM 22:18, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
Lead
- "rural land between Ellsworth, Kansas and Salina, Kansas." You mentioned in the previous sentence that the highway was in Kansas, so adding the state after either city is redundant.
Route description
- There are three instances in the first paragraph in which the citations are not in numeric order.
- "Just after passing through Carneiro K-140..." This would read better with a comma.
- "After traveling 1.001 miles (1.611 km) through the city of Brookville..." This seems too precise. Saying it's approximately one mile using {{convert/spell}} will suffice.
- Refs. 1 and 2 seem to be a bit over-cited. You do not need a Google Maps citation after every sentence. One at the end of the paragraph is fine.
- "Rural farmland" is redundant.
- First sentence in the final paragraph seems like a WP:OVERLINK violation. I don't think either pavement or concrete needs to be linked.
- The preciseness in the traffic info...just...seems way too technical. Is it necessary for you to have high/lows for every single piece of the highway with measurements down to the hundredth of a mile? It seems like overkill.
History
- More numerical order errors...
- "was established in the 1926..." And we live in the 2013. :p
- There's nothing concerning pavement. This road was first designated in 1926, so there probably wasn't yet a standard for paving U.S. Routes.
- Fixed. I added what I could...if there's any more history that could be added it's buried deep in microfilm archives of The Salina Journal. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 00:07, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
- Again, you should probably throw Ref. 6 out the window. It's likely a SPS.
- Done, let me know if the new one is acceptable instead. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 00:07, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
- Looks good to me. –TCN7JM 00:20, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
- Done, let me know if the new one is acceptable instead. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 00:07, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
Major intersections
- No outstanding errors.
References
- No problems with dead links, verifiability, or plagiarism, now that the SPS is gone. –TCN7JM 00:20, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
Final verdict
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Inappropriate due to lack to images
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall: My concerns have been addressed. I feel this meets the Good Article criteria.
- Pass/Fail:
Ellsworth County PMIS Query data
|
---|
Date: 07/19/2012 2012 Distress State, Performance Level and Distress Data Listing Page:1 ( Location References are in English units and Pavement Condition Measurements are in English units. ) <-PMS Seg.ID.No.--> LogPoint Dis P Pr Pv Prof ROUGHNESS Surv <----- FLEXIBLE DISTRESS -----> <- RIGID DISTRESS-> Co.<Route><iLP><L> Beg. End St L FY RC Ty AADT EAL Date iriL iriR Date Rt Fc1 Fc2 Fc3 Fc4 T0 T1 T2 T3 Bc F F1 F2 F3 J1J2J3J4 ---------------------------------------------------------------| in/mi |-------|lin.ft{wp}/100f|-----------------| % |------- 0.406 ECL ELLSWORTH 001 - 0.580 027(K140-0)0001(0) 0.406-1.000 131 2 _ 10 CO 781 94 5/16 93 100 4/03 _ _ 19 _ _ _ _ 57 _ _ * * * * * * * * 0.495 K140/K156 001 - 0.491 027(K140-0)0102(0) 1.000-2.000 131 2 _ 10 CO 730 100 5/16 77 81 4/03 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 70 03 _ 027(K140-0)0203(0) 2.000-3.000 131 2 _ 10 CO 730 100 5/16 79 78 4/03 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 77 _ _ 027(K140-0)0304(0) 3.000-4.000 131 2 _ 10 CO 730 100 5/16 80 76 4/03 _ _ _ _ _ _ 02 65 _ _ 027(K140-0)0405(0) 4.000-5.000 131 2 _ 10 CO 745 98 5/16 71 77 4/03 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 63 _ _ 4.014 K111/K140 004 + 0.065 027(K140-0)0506(0) 5.000-6.000 131 2 _ 10 CO 631 96 5/16 65 68 4/03 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 40 _ _ 5.264 RS1002 005 + 0.264 027(K140-0)0607(0) 6.000-7.000 131 2 _ 10 CO 590 95 5/16 68 70 4/03 _ _ _ _ _ _ 03 38 _ _ 027(K140-0)0708(0) 7.000-8.000 131 2 _ 10 CO 590 95 5/16 68 68 4/03 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 50 _ _ 027(K140-0)0809(0) 8.000-9.000 131 2 _ 10 CO 590 95 5/16 70 70 4/03 _ _ _ _ _ _ 02 35 _ _ 027(K140-0)0910(0) 9.000-10.000 131 2 _ 10 CO 590 95 5/16 67 67 4/03 _ _ _ _ _ _ 02 30 03 _ 027(K140-0)1011(0) 10.000-11.000 131 2 _ 10 CO 590 95 5/16 71 77 4/03 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 47 03 _ 11.000 RS1751 011 + 0.059 027(K140-0)1112(0) 11.000-12.000 131 2 _ 9 CO 650 86 5/16 68 73 4/03 _ _ 83 _ _ _ _ 48 _ _ 027(K140-0)1213(0) 12.000-13.000 131 2 _ 9 CO 650 86 5/16 78 68 4/03 01 _ _ _ _ _ _ 48 _ _ 027(K140-0)1314(0) 13.000-14.000 131 2 _ 9 CO 650 87 5/16 69 72 4/03 01 _ 25 _ _ _ _ 45 _ _ 13.931 K140/K141 014 - 0.098 027(K140-0)1415(0) 14.000-15.000 131 2 _ 10 CO 815 92 5/16 67 79 4/03 01 _ 25 _ _ _ _ 55 _ _ 027(K140-0)1516(0) 15.000-16.445 131 2 _ 10 CO 940 96 5/16 72 88 4/03 01 _ _ _ _ _ 02 30 _ _ 16.445 E CO L 016 + 0.334 |
Saline County PMIS Query data
|
---|
Date: 07/19/2012 2012 Distress State, Performance Level and Distress Data Listing Page:1 ( Location References are in English units and Pavement Condition Measurements are in English units. ) <-PMS Seg.ID.No.--> LogPoint Dis P Pr Pv Prof ROUGHNESS Surv <----- FLEXIBLE DISTRESS -----> <- RIGID DISTRESS-> Co.<Route><iLP><L> Beg. End St L FY RC Ty AADT EAL Date iriL iriR Date Rt Fc1 Fc2 Fc3 Fc4 T0 T1 T2 T3 Bc F F1 F2 F3 J1J2J3J4 ---------------------------------------------------------------| in/mi |-------|lin.ft{wp}/100f|-----------------| % |------- 0.000 W CO L 017 - 0.646 085(K140-0)0001(0) 0.000-1.000 131 2 _ 10 CO 940 97 5/16 60 62 4/03 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 45 _ _ 085(K140-0)0102(0) 1.000-2.000 131 2 _ 10 CO 940 97 5/16 63 61 4/03 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 48 _ _ 085(K140-0)0203(0) 2.000-3.246 121 1 _ 10 CO 940 96 5/16 62 63 4/03 _ _ _ _ _ 25 _ 25 _ _ 3.246 WCL BROOKVILLE 020 - 0.366 085(K140-0)0304(0) 3.246-4.267 121 1 _ 10 CO 1131 115 5/16 53 63 4/03 _ _ _ _ _ 23 03 13 _ _ 3.573 PERRY 020 - 0.039 4.267 ECL BROOKVILLE 021 - 0.332 085(K140-0)0405(0) 4.267-5.000 121 1 _ 10 CO 1146 115 5/16 56 62 4/03 _ _ _ _ _ 03 42 Crack _ 085(K140-0)0506(0) 5.000-6.000 131 2 _ 10 CO 1145 117 5/16 54 61 4/03 _ _ _ _ _ 07 30 30 _ _ 085(K140-0)0607(0) 6.000-7.000 121 1 _ 10 CO 1145 117 5/16 53 56 4/03 _ _ _ _ _ _ 42 13 _ _ 085(K140-0)0708(0) 7.000-8.000 121 1 _ 10 CO 1145 117 5/16 57 59 4/03 _ _ _ _ _ _ 63 03 _ _ 085(K140-0)0809(0) 8.000-9.000 121 1 _ 10 CO 1145 117 5/16 59 56 4/03 _ _ _ _ _ _ 28 03 _ _ 085(K140-0)0910(0) 9.000-10.000 121 1 _ 10 CO 1155 119 5/16 64 64 4/03 _ _ _ _ _ _ 38 03 _ _ * * * * * * * * 9.764 RS522 026 + 0.180 085(K140-0)1011(0) 10.000-11.000 121 1 _ 10 CO 1185 129 5/16 64 67 4/03 _ _ _ _ _ _ 37 02 _ _ * * * * * * * * 085(K140-0)1112(0) 11.000-12.000 121 1 _ 10 CO 1185 129 5/16 75 74 4/03 _ _ _ _ _ _ 42 03 _ _ 085(K140-0)1213(0) 12.000-13.000 121 1 _ 10 CO 1185 129 5/16 74 66 4/03 _ _ _ _ _ _ 20 15 _ _ 085(K140-0)1314(0) 13.000-14.000 121 1 _ 10 CO 1200 128 5/16 77 73 4/03 _ _ _ _ _ _ 52 Crack _ 13.764 RS1057 030 + 0.263 085(K140-0)1415(0) 14.000-15.000 121 1 _ 10 CO 845 124 5/16 86 65 4/03 _ _ _ _ _ _ 67 03 _ _ 14.264 RS450 031 - 0.234 085(K140-0)1516(0) 15.000-16.525 121 1 _ 10 CO 700 120 5/16 78 69 4/03 _ _ 17 _ _ _ 60 Crack _ 085(K140-0)1616(0) 16.525-16.769 111 1 _ 10 CO 1193 139 5/16 89 92 4/03 _ _ _ _ _ _ 22 Crack _ * * * * * * * * 16.769 I135/K140 033 + 0.262 |