Talk:Kṣitigarbha Bodhisattva Pūrvapraṇidhāna Sūtra

Buddhism Low‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religious texts (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religious texts, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Religious textsWikipedia:WikiProject Religious textsTemplate:WikiProject Religious textsReligious texts articles

New version of the sutra is needed....as

the punishment of the sin one committed in the text is much severe than those in modern criminal laws

http://www.sinc.sunysb.edu/clubs/buddhism/ksitigarbha/chap4.html

or either, moder criminal laws are need to be reviewed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.14.152.15 (talk) 06:26, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article states

However, some scholars have suspected that instead of being translated, this text may have originated in China, since no Sanskrit manuscripts of this text have been found. Part of the reason for suspicion is that the text advocates filial piety, which was stereotypically associated with Chinese culture.

but there is no reference given for who believes this. The only reference stated does not discuss this sutra and comes to the conclusion that filial piety was not a Chinese aculturation of Buddhism but also existed in India.

Alex Amies (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 10:38, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Remove ambiguity content of "Sutra Translation Committee of the United States and Canada"

The wiki is "This sutra is fundamentally a ...(Shih 2001, p. 68) " now. I change it coz this link is only the content of this sutra but talking nothing about a conclusion such as 'This sutra is fundamentally sth'. Besides, this link is a web page but it says page 68. What is page 68 here? Mahengrui1 (talk) 01:00, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Earth Store Bodhisattva.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:38, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]