Jump to content

Talk:Kâtip Çelebi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

more sources

[edit]

http://www.delinetciler.net/forum/turk-tarihi-kahraman-turkler/83455-osmanli-doneminde-tarih-yaziciligi-turklerde-tarih-yaziciligi.html?language=de http://www.amazon.com/Chronik-Ahmed-Celebi-genannt-Bihisti/dp/3878281366 James Michael DuPont (talk) 16:44, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

I think the copyright law was abused with these edits. Most of these parts are same as article written by Bekir Karliga. That website explaind their copyright policy on "Copyright and Disclaimer Statement". Takabeg (talk) 04:15, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article name

[edit]

Gbooks hits:

  • "Haji Khalfa" (233)
  • "Haji Khalifa" (222)
  • "Kâtip Çelebi" (198)
  • "Hacı Halife" (168)
  • "Haji Kalfa" (28)

Some input?--Zoupan 23:37, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Statistically, the difference between the numbers is not very significant except for the fifth variant, which is clearly less-often found. Are you invoking WP:COMMONNAME here? If so, could you develop your position a little more fully?—Jerome Kohl (talk) 02:30, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I think its clear that Haji Khal(i)fa is predominant. Now it's up to us to decide which spelling to use. Also, I think your change to the intro is unnecessary. Muhammad bin Abdullah is his name, the rest being pseudonyms and honorary titles.--Zoupan 03:13, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Updated Gbooks hits:

  • "Hadji Khalfa" (240)
  • "Haji Khalfa" (233)
  • "Haji Khalifa" (222)
  • "Hajji Khalifa" (209)
  • "Kâtip Çelebi" (198)
  • "Hadji Kalfa" (176)
  • "Hacı Halife" (168)
  • "Hadji Khalifa" (142)
  • "Hajji Khalfa" (133)
  • "Haci Kalfa" (78)
  • "Katip Chelebi" (48)
  • "Haji Kalfa" (28)
  • "Haci Khalfa" (21)
  • "Haci Khalifa" (15)
  • "Haji Kalifa" (11)
  • "Hadji Kalifa" (10)

So, if we use the combined Khalfa, we get 627, Khalifa 588, the rest less than half, and if we use Hadji, we get 568, Haji 494, Hajji 342, etc. So either "Hadji Khalfa", "Hadji Khalifa", "Haji Khalfa" or "Haji Khalifa". If we look through the four variants on 21st-c hits, we get: "Haji Khalifa" (57), "Haji Khalfa" (52), "Hadji Khalfa" (39), "Hadji Khalifa" (24). I would support "Haji Khalfa". --Zoupan 03:13, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kâtip Çelebi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:21, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Muslim leader infobox

[edit]

Whats with the muslim leader flag, should it not be changed to philosopher as this retains the 'influenced by' box and is more standard for Wikipedia. Kind Regards, NotAnotherNameGuy (talk) 20:27, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Loop

[edit]

The link for Kashf al-ẓunūn ʿan asāmī al-kutub wa al-funūn leads back to this article. 71.233.135.2 (talk) 22:46, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This has now been fixed. Thank you.Anonimu (talk) 09:50, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]