Talk:Juror's oath

Could this be merged into jury United States section?--Rent A Troop (talk) 15:23, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Since juror's oaths are used in other countries (e.g. the U.K.), there is some room for the content of this article to expand, both in size and scope. Tisane (talk) 15:32, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

The section on the United States juror's oath does not conform to WP:NPOV. It unduly emphasizes someone's opinion that jury nullification is a "constitutional right" that supersedes a juror's oath. —Mathew5000 (talk) 13:00, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, and further believe the information seems to not be relevant to the topic. I shall remove the section referencing jury nullification. Orbolus (talk) 16:59, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jury nullification is a constitutional right of all jurors to wit, they are triers of fact and law. Courts deny them this power, in direct violation of the U.S. Constitution. This ought to be pointed out in this article. (source - top grade in a college speech class in which I gave a speech on the subject of fully informed jurors). Henry Hannon (talk) 17:31, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"solemnly and sincerely declare and affirm" to "give a true verdict according to the evidence upon the issue(s) to be tried by me.

"solemnly and sincerely declare and affirm" to "give a true verdict according to the evidence upon the issue(s) to be tried by me. 27.32.2.181 (talk) 14:17, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]