Jump to content

Talk:Jurassic World Camp Cretaceous/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Bobamnertiopsis (talk · contribs) 19:34, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


I can take this one! —Collint c 19:34, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

1a: Just a few small tweaks:

  • "In March, a third ten-episode season" I think this phrasing implies that the other two seasons were also ten episodes; consider "a ten-episode third season"
 Fixed Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:15, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • There are a few instances where things are italicized when they don't need to be, namely "Camp Cretaceous" (when referring to the in-universe camp, but not the show) and "Mantah Corp".
 Fixed Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:15, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • In the episode 4 description, "Carnotaurus" should be italicized.
 Done Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:15, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "which is then sent into Isla Nublar to record the dinosaurs," should end in a period.
 Fixed Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:15, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "-ly" adverbs don't need hyphens after them, as in the cases of "recently-built" and "newly-made".
 Fixed Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:15, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "an "eco-tourist" who" should be "whom" in both instances.
 Done Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:15, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Do characters in the show use "it" pronouns for Bumpy?
Yes. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:15, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

1b: Lead does not contain info not already mentioned elsewhere in the body. Layout looks good. No words to watch problems. Article treats fiction appropriately and incorporates its character and episode lists appropriately.

2a: No qualms!

2b: Well-cited throughout (thank you for archiving sources!) to a higher-than-GA standard. Spot-checked sources brought forth no issues. What makes DVD-fever, Droid Journal, and Solzy at the Movies reliable sources?

2c: No OR concerns.

2d: Some copyvio flags from Droid Journal especially, although they appear to have copied from Wikipedia and not the other way around based on the date of the article and the text of this page at that time.

3aand 3b: No concerns; article broad in focus and does not delve into detail unnecessarily. The lead might benefit from a mention of the changes in critical reception in season 2 but I won't hold that to the GA review!

4: Neutral treatment, including of reviews.

5: Decently stable.

6a: File:Jurassic World Camp Cretaceous promo.png tagged with appropriate fair use justification. File:Glen Powell (31550284041).jpg CC-BY-SA 2.0 on Commons. File:Jurassic World Fallen Kingdom Japan Premiere Red Carpet Colin Trevorrow (42200702315).jpg CC-BY 2.0 on Commons. File:Steven Spielberg by Gage Skidmore.jpg CC-BY-SA 3.0 on Commons. All good.

6b: Images are appropriate.

All in all, looks pretty good; it's obvious a lot of work has gone into this one already. Happy to put this on hold for a week while concerns are addressed. Thank you! Kindly —Collint c 20:06, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Bobamnertiopsis: I believe I have addressed all of your suggestions. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:15, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Some Dude From North Carolina! I still have the questions about those three sources in 2b, especially Droid Journal which seemingly lifted a bunch of text verbatim from an early version of this article. 1a changes look good. —Collint c 23:39, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Bobamnertiopsis: Sorry about not addressing the issue (didn't notice it). Anyway, I have removed the references from DVD-fever and Droid Journal, but have kept the review from Solzy at the Movies because it was included at Rotten Tomatoes. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:55, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I think that's a totally reasonable justification. Thank you for your work on this, I'm happy to pass this one! Have a lovely weekend! —Collint c 00:09, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]