Jump to content

Talk:Junko Ikeuchi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 00:04, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to mainspace by Miraclepine (talk). Self-nominated at 00:24, 9 November 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Junko Ikeuchi; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Looks pretty good. I'm going to AGF on the ja-wiki print source and that the 新撰芸能人物事典 that Kotobank uses is an RS. Most of the info in Kotobank is corroborated in other sources in the article, so consider double sourcing some more of the major facts to be safe. Its hard for me to judge some of the other sources (CINEMAS+ ?) for reliability, so it'd be nice to get other eyes here. Also, for English speakers, is it clear that "20% Actress" refers to the audience share of her shows? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AjaxSmack (talkcontribs) 00:35, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@AjaxSmack: The ref attributes the nickname to high audience ratings, so it's safe to assume 20% refers to audience share. (Though the comment would be moot if a different hook is chosen.) Also, when using {{DYK checklist}}, keep in mind that a preference for other hooks doesn't count as a eligibility issue for the entire nomination, unlike for example none of a nom's hooks being valid, and instead belong in the overall section. ミラP@Miraclepine 22:29, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry. I have edited the template to reflect that. I think the sourcing has no problems, but would prefer a quick glance from another editor.  AjaxSmack  14:20, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
With no strong feelings from other editors after a month, ALT 0 is good to go. ALT 3 is my second preference if the nominator prefers that.  AjaxSmack  18:11, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]