Talk:Junk science/Archives/2015

This is an archive of past discussions about Junk science. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

POV banner needed?

Recently, an anonymous contributor, 128.8.128.33 (talk · contribs) placed the {{POV}} banner on this page but did not leave anything on the Talk page. Here's his edit summary:

Spends too much time gossiping. This should talk about the concept of bad science being pushed as good, not whether some guy is getting funded.

I'm not aware of specific passages that he considers non-neutral. You may recall that our neutrality was previously questioned back in November here in an RFC submitted by User:Stonecarver called Request for Comment: Junk science article neutrality. After discussion, Stonecarver withdrew his complaint.

Please leave a comment here if you think this article needs a POV banner. Identify the points you believe are *not* neutral and how they ought to be changed. If there is no response, after a few days I'll remove the banner. EdJohnston 16:59, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

I don't think any case has been presented. I'd favor removing the banner immediately, and waiting for someone to make a substantive case. JQ 05:18, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

The majority of this article is being used to defend proponents of man-made climate change theory. That's why it needs a tag. 192.234.160.245 (talk) 03:02, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Defend them from what? — TPX 11:52, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Removed tag, Should you want to replace it, please provide a bit more rationale. Vsmith (talk) 13:46, 22 February 2015 (UTC)