Talk:Junk Fax Prevention Act of 2005

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

First off, it appears to have been signed into law, having been passed unanimously in the Senate and by voice vote in the House.

At any rate, from [the FCC]:

Junk Fax Prevention Act of 2005

On July 9, 2005, Congress enacted the Junk Fax Prevention Act. The Act amends the TCPA by permitting businesses or entities to send unsolicited advertisements to consumers and businesses with whom the sender has an established business relationship. It also requires senders of fax advertisements to include a notice and contact information on the first page of the fax informing the recipient how to “opt-out” of any future fax advertisements from the sender.

The Act directs the FCC to issue regulations to implement these amendments no later than April 5, 2006.

I've looked at the bill text in Thomas and indeed there is a new loophole that does not appear to be present in the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991.

Has there been any major criticism of this law, such as there has been for the CAN-SPAM Act (e. g. "U CAN SPAM Act")? --Guppy313 23:52, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Changes

Added much to it to reduce it from a stub, including the major effects and criticism. Also included some history. Much of this might also be useful on the page for the TCPA. 69.208.114.2 18:08, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Junk Fax Prevention Act of 2005. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060619204521/http://www.wrf.com:80/publication.cfm?publication_id=12178 to http://www.wrf.com/publication.cfm?publication_id=12178

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:57, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]