This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
it's now much improved--and he's won national recognition for his many books, including the top prize of the American Library Association. Rjensen (talk) 11:44, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Article needs to be more clear on why it is notable
I made some minor improvements to better show this article's notability, but more could probably be made. I can see that this article probably is notable enough to keep, as can be seen by the two unsuccessful deletion attempts. However, at least at first glance, this article still seems like an unnotable promotional biography of an academic (and academics, even those not notable enough for their own articles, do have some impressive work). More work needs to be done to show how Rodriguez is notable enough to have his own article, IMHO (such as by clarifying in the intro, etc.). --1990'sguy (talk) 21:47, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
